Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36792174›Full record

ArticleBMJ mental health2023

Symptom-specific effects of counselling for depression compared to cognitive-behavioural therapy.

Ciarán O'Driscoll, Joshua E J Buckman, Rob Saunders, Sarah Ellard, Syed Ali Naqvi, Satwant Singh, Jon Wheatley, Stephen Pilling

Open access · diamondFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Depressive symptoms during the transition to adolescence: Left hippocampal volume as a marker of social context sensitivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ciarán O'DriscollCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK c.odriscoll@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7316-3041
Joshua E J BuckmanCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Rob SaundersCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah EllardWhittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Syed Ali NaqviNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust, Rainham, Havering, UK.
Satwant SinghNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust, Rainham, Havering, UK.
Jon WheatleyTalk Changes: City and Hackney IAPT Service, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Stephen PillingCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust · GBHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBWhittington Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 201292/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and counselling for depression (CfD) are recommended first-line treatments for depression. While they approach change differently, there is little understanding of the impact those approaches have on change during treatment.

objectivesThis study aimed to identify whether CBT and CfD target different symptoms and explore the implications of modelling choices when quantifying change during treatment.

methodsSymptom-specific effects of treatment were identified using moderated network modelling. This was a retrospective cohort study of 12 756 individuals who received CBT or CfD for depression in primary/community care psychological therapy services in England. Change was modelled several ways within the whole sample and a propensity score matched sample (n=3446).

findingsCBT for depression directly affected excessive worry, trouble relaxing and apprehensive expectation and had a stronger influence on changes between suicidal ideation and concentration. CfD had a stronger direct influence on thoughts of being a failure and on the associated change between being an easily annoyed and apprehensive of expectation. There were inconsistencies when modelling change using the first and second appointments as the baseline. Residual score models produced more conservative findings than models using difference scores.

conclusionsCfD and CBT for depression have differential effects on symptoms demonstrating specific mechanisms of change. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CBT was uniquely associated with changes in symptoms associated with anxiety and may be better suited to those with anxiety symptoms comorbid to their depression. When assessing change, the baseline should be the first therapy session, not the pretreatment assessment. Residual change scores should be preferred over difference score methods.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionCounselingHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdult psychiatryDepression & mood disorders

Identifiers

PMID36792174
PMCPMC10035778
OpenAlexW4320915229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read24
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.