Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36792169›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open diabetes research & care2023

Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward pre-diabetes among the public, patients with pre-diabetes and healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Kah Woon Teoh, Choon Ming Ng, Chun Wie Chong, J Simon Bell, Wing Loong Cheong, Shaun Wen Huey Lee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kah Woon TeohSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7503-0018
Choon Ming NgSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
Chun Wie ChongSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
J Simon BellSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University - Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Wing Loong CheongSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8652-7369
Shaun Wen Huey LeeSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia shaun.lee@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-6576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of pre-diabetes is increasing globally, affecting an estimated 552 million people by 2030. While lifestyle interventions are the first line of defense against progression toward diabetes, information on barriers toward pre-diabetes management and how to overcome these barriers are scarce. This systematic review describes the publics' and healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) toward pre-diabetes and determines the barriers toward pre-diabetes management. A systematic search for studies examining KAP towards pre-diabetes was conducted in six databases from inception to September 2022. Studies that quantitatively assessed at least two KAP elements using questionnaires were included. The quality of studies was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Barriers and enablers were identified and mapped onto the Capability, Motivation, and Behaviour model to identify factors that influence behavior change. Twenty-one articles that surveyed 8876 participants were included in this review. Most of the reviews (n=13) were directed to healthcare professionals. Overall, positive attitudes toward diabetes prevention efforts were observed, although there were still knowledge deficits and poor behavior toward pre-diabetes management. Barriers and enablers were detected at patients (eg, goals and intention), healthcare professionals (eg, clinical judgement) and system (eg, access and resources) levels. The use of different survey instruments to assess KAP prevented a head-to-head comparison between studies. Most studies conducted among patients were from middle-income countries, while among healthcare professionals (HCPs) were from high-income countries, which may produce some biasness. Nevertheless, the development of pre-diabetes intervention should focus on: (1) increasing knowledge on pre-diabetes and its management; (2) imparting practical skills to manage pre-diabetes; (3) providing resources for lifestyle management; (4) improving the accessibility of lifestyle management programs; and (5) other HCPs and human support to pre-diabetes management.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPrediabetic StateCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansHealth BehaviorKnowledgeLife StylePrediabetic State

Identifiers

PMID36792169
PMCPMC9933769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.