ArticleThe world journal of men's health2023
Geographic Differences in Semen Quality among a Cohort of American Men Using Mail-in Sperm Testing Kits.
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heat exposure during susceptible windows of spermatogenesis and sperm epigenetic age.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Trial
- Temporal trends in semen parameters among men attending a fertility center in the UAE (2012 - 2022): a retrospective study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Exploring geographical differences in semen quality of young men using spatial dependence analysis.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Male Factor Infertility and the Rural-Urban Continuum.Urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the relationship between regional geography and sperm parameters in a cohort of American men using at-home mail-in semen collection kits with no previous self-reported history of male factor infertility. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, 5,822 men from six different regions of the United States (Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, West, Pacific, and Southwest) who self-requested semen analysis between 2019 and 2021 were enrolled.
resultsAcross the entire cohort, the mean sperm concentration was 43.79±55.43 ×10
conclusionsThis study provides the most comprehensive and up-to-date report on semen parameter variability among a cohort of men living in six different regions of the continental USA. This study will pave the way into a deeper discussion of the interplay between geography, social determinants of fertility care and semen quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.