Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36791848›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2023

Probabilistic risk assessment of residential exposure to metal(loid)s in a mining impacted community.

Diego Huerta, Taylor Schobel, Annika Alexander-Ozinskas, Joanne Hild, Jeff Lauder, Peggy Reynolds, Julie Von Behren, Dan Meltzer, Mónica D Ramírez-Andreotta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diego HuertaDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Taylor SchobelSierra Streams Institute, Nevada City, CA, United States of America.
Annika Alexander-OzinskasSierra Streams Institute, Nevada City, CA, United States of America.
Joanne HildSierra Streams Institute, Nevada City, CA, United States of America.
Jeff LauderSierra Streams Institute, Nevada City, CA, United States of America.
Peggy ReynoldsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America.
Julie Von BehrenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America.
Dan MeltzerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America.
Mónica D Ramírez-AndreottaDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health's Division of Community, Environment & Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America. Electronic address: mdramire@arizona.edu.
Sierra Streams Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

TRANSPORT OF TRACE METALS IN A POLLUTED AQUIFERP42ES004940 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Xinxin Ding · 1990 to 2026
$68.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "Gold Country" region of California is impacted by legacy and active gold mines. Concomitantly, Gold Country has an increased rate of female breast cancer relative to the state average. Using community-based participatory research methods, 40 participants completed surveys and collected a total of 354 water, soil, home-grown foods, and dust samples from their homes, which we compared to state, federal, and international contamination standards for arsenic, cadmium, and lead. All soil samples exceeded U.S. EPA and California EPA soil standards for arsenic. When comparing other media to state, federal and international standards for arsenic, cadmium, and lead, 15 additional exceedances for indoor/outdoor dust, drinking water, and/or vegetable were documented. A probabilistic risk assessment was conducted to determine an adult female's exposure to arsenic, cadmium, and lead and estimated risk. Arsenic exposure, due largely to water (63.5 %) and homegrown food (33.3 %), presents carcinogenic risks in excess of the EPA recommended upper limit for contaminated sites (1 × 10

Indexed as

ArsenicBreast NeoplasmsDrinking WaterSoil PollutantsAdultCadmiumDustEnvironmental ExposureFemaleGoldHumansRisk AssessmentSoilArsenicCadmiumDrinking WaterDustGoldSoilSoil PollutantsArsenicBreast cancer, exposure assessmentCadmiumDustHomegrown foodsIncidental soil ingestionLeadMining wasteRisk assessmentRisk characterizationWater

Identifiers

PMID36791848
PMCPMC10023505
OpenAlexW4320731687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.