ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023
Auto-segmentation of the tibia and femur from knee MR images via deep learning and its application to cartilage strain and recovery.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D CSFA-UNet: a unified attention-driven deep learning framework for accurate knee MRI segmentation and osteoarthritis severity classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and robotic technologies redefining precision and personalization in orthopedic surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- The application of transfer learning to T1ρ MRI tibiofemoral cartilage segmentation.Journal of biomechanics · 2026Article
- Computer Vision in Lower Limb Orthopaedics: A Scoping Review of Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Applications.Cureus · 2025Review
- A deep learning-based approach for measuring patellar cartilage deformations from knee MR images.Journal of biomechanics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence demonstrates potential to enhance orthopaedic imaging across multiple modalities: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- A Two stage deep learning network for automated femoral segmentation in bilateral lower limb CT scans.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tibiofemoral cartilage strain and recovery following a 3-mile run measured using deep learning segmentation of bone and cartilage.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
- Mitigation of image distortion during mechanical testing within a dynamic stereo x-ray system.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A comparison of three methods for establishing an ACL reference length in vivo.Journal of biomechanics · 2024Article
- Association Between Tibiofemoral Bone Shape Features and Retears After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a semi-automated and unsupervised method for femur segmentation from CT.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Integration of Swin UNETR and statistical shape modeling for a semi-automated segmentation of the knee and biomechanical modeling of articular cartilage.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Use of a novel magnetically actuated compression system to study the temporal dynamics of axial and lateral strain in human osteochondral plugs.Journal of biomechanics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to efficiently and reproducibly generate subject-specific 3D models of bone and soft tissue is important to many areas of musculoskeletal research. However, methodologies requiring such models have largely been limited by lengthy manual segmentation times. Recently, machine learning, and more specifically, convolutional neural networks, have shown potential to alleviate this bottleneck in research throughput. Thus, the purpose of this work was to develop a modified version of the convolutional neural network architecture U-Net to automate segmentation of the tibia and femur from double echo steady state knee magnetic resonance (MR) images. Our model was trained on a dataset of over 4,000 MR images from 34 subjects, segmented by three experienced researchers, and reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. For our validation and testing sets, we achieved dice coefficients of 0.985 and 0.984, respectively. As further testing, we applied our trained model to a prior study of tibial cartilage strain and recovery. In this analysis, across all subjects, there were no statistically significant differences in cartilage strain between the machine learning and ground truth bone models, with a mean difference of 0.2 ± 0.7 % (mean ± 95 % confidence interval). This difference is within the measurement resolution of previous cartilage strain studies from our lab using manual segmentation. In summary, we successfully trained, validated, and tested a machine learning model capable of segmenting MR images of the knee, achieving results that are comparable to trained human segmenters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.