Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36791514›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023

Auto-segmentation of the tibia and femur from knee MR images via deep learning and its application to cartilage strain and recovery.

Sophia Y Kim-Wang, Patrick X Bradley, Hattie C Cutcliffe, Amber T Collins, Bryan S Crook, Chinmay S Paranjape, Charles E Spritzer, Louis E DeFrate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sophia Y Kim-WangDuke University School of Medicine, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, United States.
Patrick X BradleyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, United States.
Hattie C CutcliffeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, United States.
Amber T CollinsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, United States.
Bryan S CrookDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, United States.
Chinmay S ParanjapeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, United States.
Charles E SpritzerDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, United States.
Louis E DeFrateDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, United States; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, United States; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: Lou.DeFrate@duke.edu.

Funding

In Vivo Knee Motion and ACL Biomechanics During Dynamic ActivitiesR01AR065527 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2014 to 2024
$4.8M
Biomechanical and Biological Predictors of Cartilage Health Following Meniscus InjuryR01AR079184 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E., GOODE, ADAM · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Weight loss, in vivo cartilage mechanics, and joint healthR01AR074800 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065527NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074800NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to efficiently and reproducibly generate subject-specific 3D models of bone and soft tissue is important to many areas of musculoskeletal research. However, methodologies requiring such models have largely been limited by lengthy manual segmentation times. Recently, machine learning, and more specifically, convolutional neural networks, have shown potential to alleviate this bottleneck in research throughput. Thus, the purpose of this work was to develop a modified version of the convolutional neural network architecture U-Net to automate segmentation of the tibia and femur from double echo steady state knee magnetic resonance (MR) images. Our model was trained on a dataset of over 4,000 MR images from 34 subjects, segmented by three experienced researchers, and reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. For our validation and testing sets, we achieved dice coefficients of 0.985 and 0.984, respectively. As further testing, we applied our trained model to a prior study of tibial cartilage strain and recovery. In this analysis, across all subjects, there were no statistically significant differences in cartilage strain between the machine learning and ground truth bone models, with a mean difference of 0.2 ± 0.7 % (mean ± 95 % confidence interval). This difference is within the measurement resolution of previous cartilage strain studies from our lab using manual segmentation. In summary, we successfully trained, validated, and tested a machine learning model capable of segmenting MR images of the knee, achieving results that are comparable to trained human segmenters.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTibiaCartilageFemurHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingAuto-segmentationMachine LearningMRIStrainU-Net

Identifiers

PMID36791514
PMCPMC10281551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.