Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36791465›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2023

Mining adverse events in large frequency tables with ontology, with an application to the vaccine adverse event reporting system.

Bangyao Zhao, Lili Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bangyao ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2482-391X
Lili ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-8206

Funding

Incorporation of multilevel ontologies of adverse events and vaccines for vaccine safety surveillanceR01AI158543 · NIAID · WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL RESEARCH INST · PI ZHAO, LILI · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI158543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many statistical methods have been applied to VAERS (vaccine adverse event reporting system) database to study the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. However, none of these methods considered the adverse event (AE) ontology. The AE ontology contains important information about biological similarities between AEs. In this paper, we develop a model to estimate vaccine-AE associations while incorporating the AE ontology. We model a group of AEs using the zero-inflated negative binomial model and then estimate the vaccine-AE association using the empirical Bayes approach. This model handles the AE count data with excess zeros and allows borrowing information from related AEs. The proposed approach was evaluated by simulation studies and was further illustrated by an application to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) dataset. The proposed method is implemented in an R package available at https://github.com/umich-biostatistics/zGPS.AO.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsBayes TheoremHumansUnited StatesVaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesadverse event ontologyempirical Bayesvaccine adverse eventVAERSzero-inflated negative binomial distribution

Identifiers

PMID36791465
PMCPMC10133006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.