Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36791141›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Development of a cost-effective, morphology-preserving method for DNA isolation from bulk invertebrate trap catches: Tephritid fruit flies as an exemplar.

Elizabeth V Fowler, Melissa L Starkie, Xiaocheng Zhu, Alexander M Piper, Arati Agarwal, Lea Rako, Alexandra Gardiner, Sybilla Oczkowicz, David Gopurenko, Mark K Schutze and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elizabeth V FowlerQueensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-9885
Melissa L StarkieQueensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Xiaocheng ZhuNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Alexander M PiperAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0664-7564
Arati AgarwalAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Lea RakoAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Alexandra GardinerQueensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sybilla OczkowiczQueensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
David GopurenkoNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2886-1614
Mark K SchutzeQueensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mark J BlacketAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect identification and preservation of voucher specimens is integral to pest diagnostic and surveillance activities; yet bulk-trapped insects are a diagnostic challenge due to high catch numbers and the susceptibility of samples to environmental damage. Many insect trap catches rely on examination of morphological characters for species identifications, which is a time consuming and highly skilled task, hence there is a need for more efficient molecular approaches. Many bulk DNA extraction methods require destructive sampling of specimens, resulting in damaged, or fully destroyed, voucher specimens. We developed an inexpensive, rapid, bulk DNA isolation method that preserves specimens as pinned vouchers to a standard that allows for post-extraction morphological examination and inclusion in insect reference collections. Our protocol was validated using a group of insects that are time-consuming to identify when trapped in large numbers-the dacine fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae). In developing our method, we evaluated existing protocols against the following criteria: effect on morphology; suitability for large trap catches; cost; ease of handling; and application to downstream molecular diagnostic analyses such as real-time PCR and metabarcoding. We found that the optimum method for rapid isolation of DNA extraction was immersing flies in a NaOH:TE buffer at 75°C for 10 minutes, without the need for proteinase K or detergents. This HotSOAK method produced sufficient high-quality DNA whilst preserving morphological characters suitable for species-level identification with up to 20,000 flies in a sample. The lysates performed well in down-stream analyses such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and real-time PCR applications, while for metabarcoding PCR the lysate required an additional column purification step. Development of this method is a key step required for upscaling our capacity to accurately detect insects captured in bulk traps, whether for biodiversity, biosecurity, or pest management objectives.

Indexed as

InsectaTephritidaeAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisDNADrosophilaReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA

Identifiers

PMID36791141
PMCPMC9931127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.