Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36791068›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

New AI-algorithms on smartphones to detect skin cancer in a clinical setting-A validation study.

Teresa Kränke, Katharina Tripolt-Droschl, Lukas Röd, Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof, Michael Koppitz, Michael Tripolt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Teresa KränkeDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8406-6063
Katharina Tripolt-DroschlDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Lukas RödMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Rainer Hofmann-WellenhofDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Michael KoppitzMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Michael TripoltDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe incidence of skin cancer is rising worldwide and there is medical need to optimize its early detection. This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic and risk-assessment accuracy of two new diagnosis-based neural networks (analyze and detect), which comply with the CE-criteria, in evaluating the malignant potential of various skin lesions on a smartphone. Of note, the intention of our study was to evaluate the performance of these medical products in a clinical setting for the first time.

methodsThis was a prospective, single-center clinical study at one tertiary referral center in Graz, Austria. Patients, who were either scheduled for preventive skin examination or removal of at least one skin lesion were eligible for participation. Patients were assessed by at least two dermatologists and by the integrated algorithms on different mobile phones. The lesions to be recorded were randomly selected by the dermatologists. The diagnosis of the algorithm was stated as correct if it matched the diagnosis of the two dermatologists or the histology (if available). The histology was the reference standard, however, if both clinicians considered a lesion as being benign no histology was performed and the dermatologists were stated as reference standard.

resultsA total of 238 patients with 1171 lesions (86 female; 36.13%) with an average age of 66.19 (SD = 17.05) was included. Sensitivity and specificity of the detect algorithm were 96.4% (CI 93.94-98.85) and 94.85% (CI 92.46-97.23); for the analyze algorithm a sensitivity of 95.35% (CI 93.45-97.25) and a specificity of 90.32% (CI 88.1-92.54) were achieved. DISCUSSION: The studied neural networks succeeded analyzing the risk of skin lesions with a high diagnostic accuracy showing that they are sufficient tools in calculating the probability of a skin lesion being malignant. In conjunction with the wide spread use of smartphones this new AI approach opens the opportunity for a higher early detection rate of skin cancer with consecutive lower epidemiological burden of metastatic cancer and reducing health care costs. This neural network moreover facilitates the empowerment of patients, especially in regions with a low density of medical doctors. REGISTRATION: Approved and registered at the ethics committee of the Medical University of Graz, Austria (Approval number: 30-199 ex 17/18).

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySmartphone

Identifiers

PMID36791068
PMCPMC9931135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.