Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36791063›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Co-developing a health promotion programme for indigenous youths in Brazil: A concept mapping report.

Paulo T C Jardim, Josiliane M Dias, Antonio J Grande, André B Veras, Érika K Ferri, Fatima A A Quadros, Clayton Peixoto, Francielle C S Botelho, Maria I M G Oliveira, Ieda M A V Dias and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Infrastructure-health nexus in Brazil: a scoping review.Global health research and policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulo T C JardimMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0416-534X
Josiliane M DiasMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Antonio J GrandeMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-075X
André B VerasMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Érika K FerriMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Fatima A A QuadrosMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3365-6001
Clayton PeixotoMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Francielle C S BotelhoMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Maria I M G OliveiraMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Ieda M A V DiasFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9445-6062
Majella O'KeeffeFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-3835
Christelle EliaFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8298-8440
Paola DazzanDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Ingrid WolfeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Seeromanie HardingDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRKing's College London · GBUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R022739/1Medical Research Council MR/S003444/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatin America and the Caribbean Region are home to about 42 million Indigenous people, with about 900,000 living in Brazil. The little routinely collected population-level data from Indigenous communities in the region available shows stark inequities in health and well-being. There are 305 Indigenous ethnic groups, speaking 274 languages, spread across the remote national territory, who have endured long-lasting inequities related to poverty, poor health, and limited access to health care. Malnutrition and mental health are key concerns for young people. Building on our Indigenous communities-academic partnerships over the last two decades, we collaborated with young people from the Terena Indigenous ethnic group, village leaders, teachers, parents, and local health practitioners from the Polo Base (community health centres) to obtain their perspectives on important and feasible actions for a youth health promotion programme.

methodsThe report was conducted in the Tereré Village in Mato Grosso do Sul. Concept mapping, a participatory mixed method approach, was conducted in 7 workshops, 15 adults and 40 youths aged 9-17 years. Art-based concept mapping was used with 9 to 11 years old children (N = 20). Concept systems software was used to create concept maps, which were finalised during the workshops. Focused prompts related to factors that may influence the health and happiness of youths. The participatory method gave Terena youths a significant voice in shaping an agenda that can improve their health.

resultsTerena youths identified priority actions that clustered under 'Family', 'School', 'Education', 'Socio-economic circumstances', 'Respect' and 'Sport' in response to protecting happiness; and 'Nutrition pattern', 'Physical activity', 'Local environment', and 'Well-being' in response to having a healthy body. Through the participatory lens of concept mapping, youths articulated the interconnectedness of priority actions across these clusters such that behaviours (e.g. Nutrition pattern, drinking water, physical activity) and aspirations (being able to read, to have a good job) were recognised to be dependent on a wider ecology of factors (e.g. loss of eco-systems, parent-child relationships, student- teacher relationships, parental unemployment). In response to developing youth health, Terena adults suggested priority actions that clustered under 'Relationships', 'Health issues', 'Prevention at Polo Base', 'Access to health care', 'Communication with young people', 'Community life', 'Raising awareness' and 'School support'. Their priorities reflected the need for structural transformative actions (e.g. Polo Base and school staff working together) and for embedding actions to protect Indigenous culture (e.g. integrating their cultural knowledge into training programmes).

conclusionsConcept maps of Indigenous youths emphasised the need for a health promotion programme that engages with the structural and social determinants of health to protect their happiness and health, whilst those of adults emphasised the need to address specific health issues through preventative care via a school-Polo Base collaboration. Investment in a co-developed school-Polo-Base health promotion programme, with intersectoral engagement, has potential for making Indigenous health systems responsive to the inequalities of youth health, to yield dividends for healthy ageing trajectories as well as for the health of the next generation.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PromotionAdolescentAdultBrazilChildEthnicityHumansStudents

Identifiers

PMID36791063
PMCPMC9931109
OpenAlexW4320856594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.