Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36791061›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Functional duality in group criticality via ambiguous interactions.

Takayuki Niizato, Hisashi Murakami, Takuya Musha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takayuki NiizatoFaculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8104-9038
Hisashi MurakamiFaculty of Information and Human Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto city, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuya MushaFaculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical phenomena are wildly observed in living systems. If the system is at criticality, it can quickly transfer information and achieve optimal response to external stimuli. Especially, animal collective behavior has numerous critical properties, which are related to other research regions, such as the brain system. Although the critical phenomena influencing collective behavior have been extensively studied, two important aspects require clarification. First, these critical phenomena never occur on a single scale but are instead nested from the micro- to macro-levels (e.g., from a Lévy walk to scale-free correlation). Second, the functional role of group criticality is unclear. To elucidate these aspects, the ambiguous interaction model is constructed in this study; this model has a common framework and is a natural extension of previous representative models (such as the Boids and Vicsek models). We demonstrate that our model can explain the nested criticality of collective behavior across several scales (considering scale-free correlation, super diffusion, Lévy walks, and 1/f fluctuation for relative velocities). Our model can also explain the relationship between scale-free correlation and group turns. To examine this relation, we propose a new method, applying partial information decomposition (PID) to two scale-free induced subgroups. Using PID, we construct information flows between two scale-free induced subgroups and find that coupling of the group morphology (i.e., the velocity distributions) and its fluctuation power (i.e., the fluctuation distributions) likely enable rapid group turning. Thus, the flock morphology may help its internal fluctuation convert to dynamic behavior. Our result sheds new light on the role of group morphology, which is relatively unheeded, retaining the importance of fluctuation dynamics in group criticality.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalBrainAnimalsDiffusionMass Behavior

Identifiers

PMID36791061
PMCPMC9931117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.