Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790896›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023

A carbapenem-focused antimicrobial stewardship programme implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in a setting of high endemicity for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Nikolaos Spernovasilis, Evangelos I Kritsotakis, Anna Mathioudaki, Alexandra Vouidaski, Christos Spanias, Maria Petrodaskalaki, Petros Ioannou, Georgios Chamilos, Diamantis P Kofteridis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nikolaos SpernovasilisSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6981-8535
Evangelos I KritsotakisSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9526-3852
Anna MathioudakiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
Alexandra VouidaskiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
Christos SpaniasDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
Maria PetrodaskalakiDepartment of Quality & Research, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
Petros IoannouSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Georgios ChamilosSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Diamantis P KofteridisSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGreece is among the countries characterized by high rates of antimicrobial resistance and high consumption of antibiotics, including carbapenems.

objectivesTo measure the impact of a carbapenem-focused antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on the antibiotic consumption and patient outcomes in a Greek tertiary hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA quasi-experimental, before-after study, comparing a 12 month pre-intervention period with a 12 month intervention period in which a carbapenem-focused ASP was implemented.

resultsA total of 1268 patients were enrolled. The proportion of admitted patients who received carbapenems decreased from 4.1% (842 of 20 629) to 2.3% (426 of 18 245) (-1.8%; P < 0.001). A decrease of -4.9 DDD/100 patient-days (PD) (95% CI -7.3 to -2.6; P = 0.007) in carbapenem use and an increase in the use of piperacillin/tazobactam [+2.1 DDD/100 PD (95% CI 1.0-3.3; P = 0.010)] were observed. Thirty-day mortality following initiation of carbapenem treatment and all-cause in-hospital mortality remained unaltered after ASP implementation. In contrast, length of hospital stay increased (median 17.0 versus 19.0 days; P < 0.001), while the risk of infection-related readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge decreased (24.6% versus 16.8%; P = 0.007). In the post-implementation period, acceptance of the ASP intervention was associated with lower daily hazard of in-hospital death [cause-specific HR (csHR) 0.49; 95% CI 0.30-0.80], lower odds of 30 day mortality (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.18-0.70) and higher rate of treatment success (csHR 2.45; 95% CI 1.59-3.77).

conclusionsImplementing and maintaining a carbapenem-focused ASP is feasible, effective and safe in settings with high rates of antimicrobial resistance, even during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipCOVID-19Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsGram-Negative BacteriaHospital MortalityHumansPandemicsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID36790896
PMCPMC11023244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.