Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790851›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2023

Remote Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Survivors Using a Smartphone App and Internet of Things-Based Device: Development and Usability Study.

Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh, Tayebeh Baniasadi, Mohammad Shirkhoda, Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori, Niloofar Mohammadzadeh, Kamran Roudini, Reza Ghalehtaki, Fereidoon Memari, Amirmohsen Jalaeefar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Seyed Mohammad AyyoubzadehDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-7818
Tayebeh BaniasadiDepartment of Health Information Technology, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-291X
Mohammad ShirkhodaDepartment of General Surgery, Subdivision of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8064-5623
Sharareh Rostam Niakan KalhoriDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7577-1200
Niloofar MohammadzadehDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-9227
Kamran RoudiniDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0166-0505
Reza GhalehtakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1162-2019
Fereidoon MemariDepartment of General Surgery, Subdivision of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-8104
Amirmohsen JalaeefarDepartment of General Surgery, Subdivision of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-7828
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRHormozgan University of Medical Sciences · IRMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEMotamed Cancer Institute · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with colorectal cancer who undergo surgery face many postoperative problems. These problems include the risk of relapse, side effects, and long-term complications.

objectiveThis study sought to design and develop a remote monitoring system as a technological solution for the postdischarge care of these patients.

methodsThis research was conducted in 3 main steps: system feature extraction, system design, and evaluation. After feature extraction from a systematic review, the necessary features were defined by 18 clinical experts in Iran. In the next step, the architecture of the system was designed based on the requirements; the software and hardware parts of the system were embedded in the architecture, then the software system components were drawn using the unified modeling language diagrams, and the details of software system implementation were identified. Regarding the hardware design, different accessible hardware modules were evaluated, and suitable ones were selected. Finally, the usability of the system was evaluated by demonstrating it over a Skype virtual meeting session and using Nilsen's usability principles.

resultsA total of 21 mandatory features in 5 main categories, including patient information registration, periodic monitoring of health parameters, education, reminders, and assessments, were defined and validated for the system. The software was developed using an ASP.Net core backend, a Microsoft SQL Server database, and an Ionic frontend alongside the Angular framework, to build an Android app. The user roles of the system included 3 roles: physicians, patients, and the system administrator. The hardware was designed to contain an Esp8266 as the Internet of Things module, an MLX90614 infrared temperature sensor, and the Maxim Integrated MAX30101 sensor for sensing the heartbeat. The hardware was designed in the shape of a wristband device using SolidWorks 2020 and printed using a 3D printer. The firmware of the hardware was developed in Arduino with the capability of firmware over the air. In evaluating the software system from the perspective of usability, the system received an average score of 3.8 out of 5 from 4 evaluators.

conclusionsSensor-based telemonitoring systems for patients with colorectal cancer after surgery are possible solutions that can make the process automatic for patients and caregivers. The apps for remote colorectal patient monitoring could be designed to be useful; however, more research regarding the developed system's implementation in clinic settings and hospitals is required to understand the probable barriers and limitations.

Indexed as

cancercancer carecancer survivorcolorectal cancereHealthIoTmHealthpatient carepatient monitoringpostdischarge carepostoperative complicationsremote monitoringtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36790851
PMCPMC9978953
OpenAlexW4312432050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.