Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790820›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

Medical Application of Geometric Deep Learning for the Diagnosis of Glaucoma.

Alexandre H Thiéry, Fabian Braeu, Tin A Tun, Tin Aung, Michaël J A Girard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DI-UNet: dual-branch interactive U-Net for skin cancer image segmentation.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Big data for imaging assessment in glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandre H ThiéryDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Fabian BraeuOphthalmic Engineering & Innovation Laboratory, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Tin A TunSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Tin AungSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Michaël J A GirardOphthalmic Engineering & Innovation Laboratory, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Singapore National Eye Center · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: (1) To assess the performance of geometric deep learning in diagnosing glaucoma from a single optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan of the optic nerve head and (2) to compare its performance to that obtained with a three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (CNN), and with a gold-standard parameter, namely, the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Methods: Scans of the optic nerve head were acquired with OCT for 477 glaucoma and 2296 nonglaucoma subjects. All volumes were automatically segmented using deep learning to identify seven major neural and connective tissues. Each optic nerve head was then represented as a 3D point cloud with approximately 1000 points. Geometric deep learning (PointNet) was then used to provide a glaucoma diagnosis from a single 3D point cloud. The performance of our approach (reported using the area under the curve [AUC]) was compared with that obtained with a 3D CNN, and with the RNFL thickness. Results: PointNet was able to provide a robust glaucoma diagnosis solely from a 3D point cloud (AUC = 0.95 ± 0.01).The performance of PointNet was superior to that obtained with a 3D CNN (AUC = 0.87 ± 0.02 [raw OCT images] and 0.91 ± 0.02 [segmented OCT images]) and with that obtained from RNFL thickness alone (AUC = 0.80 ± 0.03). Conclusions: We provide a proof of principle for the application of geometric deep learning in glaucoma. Our technique requires significantly less information as input to perform better than a 3D CNN, and with an AUC superior to that obtained from RNFL thickness. Translational Relevance: Geometric deep learning may help us to improve and simplify diagnosis and prognosis applications in glaucoma.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlaucomaOptic DiskHumansRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID36790820
PMCPMC9940771
OpenAlexW4320857295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.