Trial reportJAMA network open2023
Effect of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction vs Total Gastrectomy on Hemoglobin Level and Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Comparing Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Upper Third Early Gastric Cancer (KLASS-05)
A Single-center, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study on the Effect of Different Digestive Tract Reconstruction Methods on Postoperative Quality of Life After Proximal Gastrectomy
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison on the reflux and nutritional status of different reconstruction methods after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Proximal vs. total gastrectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Proximal vs. total gastrectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Can proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction replace total gastrectomy? a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life of reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant therapy reshapes the therapeutic value of distal lymphadenectomy in cT3/4a proximal gastric cancer.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Proximal Gastrectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Function-Preserving Surgery for Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Functional Outcomes and Anti-Reflux Performance of Reconstruction Methods Following Proximal Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Defining Recovery After Gastrectomy: Insights from Longitudinally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Simple clinical parameters to identify sarcopenia 1 year after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
- Survival Comparison of Proximal and Total Gastrectomy after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Siewert Type II/III Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gastric Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Factors associated with esophagojejunostomy stricture and its clinical impact after gastrectomy: a 10-year single-center study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Age-dependent trade-offs between tubular esophagogastric and double-tract anastomosis after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Tunnel Anastomosis vs Double-Tract Jejunal Interposition Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy: Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Perioperative Nutritional Treatment for Patients With Gastric Cancer: Focusing on Recent Controversial Issues.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Transpacific multicenter collaborative study of minimally invasive proximal gastrectomy vs. minimally invasive total gastrectomy for proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers: 3-month follow-up results.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Anatomical Alterations and Endoscopic Strategies After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy (PG) with double-tract reconstruction (DTR) have been reported to have an incidence of reflux esophagitis that is as low as that observed after total gastrectomy (TG). It is unclear whether PG has an advantage over TG for the treatment of patients with upper early gastric cancer (GC). Objective: To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic PG with DTR (LPG-DTR) vs laparoscopic TG (LTG) on levels of hemoglobin and vitamin B12 supplementation required among patients with clinically early GC in the upper third of the stomach (upper-third early GC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter open-label superiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at 10 institutions in Korea. A total of 138 patients with upper-third cT1N0M0 GC were enrolled between October 27, 2016, and September 9, 2018. Follow-up ended on December 3, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized to undergo either LPG-DTR or LTG. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary co-end points were change in hemoglobin level and cumulative amount of vitamin B12 supplementation at 2 years after LPG-DTR or LTG. The secondary end points included morbidity, postoperative reflux esophagitis, quality of life, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Quality of life outcomes were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) 30-item core questionnaire (C30) and the EORTC QLQ stomach cancer-specific questionnaire at 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Results: Among 138 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.0 [10.9] years; 87 men [63.0%]; all of Asian race and Korean ethnicity), 68 (mean [SD] age, 56.7 [10.4] years; 39 men [57.4%]) were randomized to receive LPG-DTR and 69 (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [11.3] years; 48 men [69.6%]) were randomized to receive LTG. The mean (SD) changes in hemoglobin levels from baseline to month 24 were -5.6% (7.4%) in the LPG-DTR group and -6.9% (8.3%) in the LTG group, for an estimated difference of -1.3% (95% CI, -4.0% to 1.4%; P = .35). The mean (SD) cumulative amount of vitamin B12 supplementation was 0.4 (1.3) mg in the LPG-DTR group and 2.5 (3.0) mg in the LTG group, for an estimated difference of 2.1 mg (95% CI, 1.3-2.9 mg; P < .001). The late complication rates in the LPG-DTR and LTG groups were 17.6% and 10.1%, respectively (P = .31). The incidence of reflux esophagitis was not different between the LPG-DTR and LTG groups (2.9% vs 2.9%; P = .99). Compared with the LTG group, the LPG-DTR group had better physical functioning scores (85.2 [15.6] vs 79.9 [19.3]; P = .03) and social functioning scores (89.5 [17.9] vs 82.4 [19.4]; P = .03) on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Two-year overall survival (98.5% vs 100%; P = .33) and disease-free survival (98.5% vs 97.1%; P = .54) did not significantly differ between the LPG-DTR vs LTG groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, patients with upper-third early GC who received LPG-DTR required less vitamin B12 supplementation than those who received LTG, with no increase in complication rates and no difference in overall and disease-free survival rates. There was no difference in change in hemoglobin level between groups. In addition, the LPG-DTR group had better physical and social functioning than the LTG group. These findings suggest that LPG-DTR may be as safe as LTG and may be a function-preserving procedure for the treatment of patients with upper-third early GC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02892643.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.