Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790733›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Role of Intraoperative Assessment of Proximal Bile Duct Margin Status and Additional Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Can Local Clearance Trump Tumor Biology? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Fumihiro Kawano, Hiromichi Ito, Atsushi Oba, Yoshihiro Ono, Takafumi Sato, Yosuke Inoue, Yoshihiro Mise, Akio Saiura, Yu Takahashi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Frozen sections in hepatobiliary surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fumihiro KawanoDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromichi ItoDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan. hiromichi.ito@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0941-2055
Atsushi ObaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro OnoDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
Takafumi SatoDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke InoueDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro MiseDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akio SaiuraDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu TakahashiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan. yu.takahashi@jfcr.or.jp.
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPJuntendo University · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of the proximal bile duct margin status in resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis to assess the bile duct margin status is commonly used during PHCC resection. However, the impact of additional resection after obtaining a positive margin on the long-term outcome remains unclear. PATIENTS AND

methodsAmong the 257 patients who underwent PHCC resection, 190 patients with a negative distal margin were included and analyzed. IFS analysis of the proximal bile duct margin was performed in all patients. A positive margin was defined by the presence of either invasive cancer, or carcinoma, in situ.

resultsIFS analysis revealed an initial positive margin in 69 (36%) patients. Among 20 patients who underwent re-resection, only 11 patients achieved a negative margin (secondary R0). An initial positive margin was associated with poor long-term outcomes: recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16 and 25 months for patients with an initial positive margin, but 47 and 63 months for patients with an initial negative margin, respectively (p < 0.0001). In contrast, there was no difference in RFS or OS between patients with a secondary R0 margin, and those with a final R1 margin (14 vs. 16 months for RFS, p = 0.98, and 23 versus 25 months for OS, p = 0.63, respectively).

conclusionAn IFS-positive proximal hepatic duct margin dictates poor long-term outcomes for patients with resectable PHCC. Additional resection has minimal impact on survival, even when negative margin is achieved.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaKlatskin TumorBile Ducts, IntrahepaticBiologyHepatic Duct, CommonHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36790733
OpenAlexW4320857175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.