Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790674›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

Multi-phase synthetic contrast enhancement in interventional computed tomography for guiding renal cryotherapy.

Mark A Pinnock, Yipeng Hu, Steve Bandula, Dean C Barratt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A PinnockCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK. mark.pinnock.18@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-2458
Yipeng HuCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.
Steve BandulaCentre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Dean C BarrattCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.
Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimally invasive treatments for renal carcinoma offer a low rate of complications and quick recovery. One drawback of the use of computed tomography (CT) for needle guidance is the use of iodinated contrast agents, which require an increased X-ray dose and can potentially cause adverse reactions. The purpose of this work is to generalise the problem of synthetic contrast enhancement to allow the generation of multiple phases on non-contrast CT data from a real-world, clinical dataset without training multiple convolutional neural networks.

methodsA framework for switching between contrast phases by conditioning the network on the phase information is proposed and compared with separately trained networks. We then examine how the degree of supervision affects the generated contrast by evaluating three established architectures: U-Net (fully supervised), Pix2Pix (adversarial with supervision), and CycleGAN (fully adversarial).

resultsWe demonstrate that there is no performance loss when testing the proposed method against separately trained networks. Of the training paradigms investigated, the fully adversarial CycleGAN performs the worst, while the fully supervised U-Net generates more realistic voxel intensities and performed better than Pix2Pix in generating contrast images for use in a downstream segmentation task. Lastly, two models are shown to generalise to intra-procedural data not seen during the training process, also enhancing features such as needles and ice balls relevant to interventional radiological procedures.

conclusionThe proposed contrast switching framework is a feasible option for generating multiple contrast phases without the overhead of training multiple neural networks, while also being robust towards unseen data and enhancing contrast in features relevant to clinical practice.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerCryotherapyHumansRadiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyContrast enhancementConvolutional neural networkDeep learningInterventional radiology

Identifiers

PMID36790674
PMCPMC10363071
OpenAlexW4320857448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.