Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790668›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology reports2023

Diagnostic Accuracy of Liquid Biopsy for Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders and Head and Neck Cancer: an Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo, Alan Roger Santos-Silva, Luiz Paulo Kowalski

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. miR-185 in salivary extracellular vesicles for early diagnosis of malignant transformation in oral leukoplakia: a clinical study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Luíza Damaceno AraújoOral Diagnosis Department, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alan Roger Santos-SilvaOral Diagnosis Department, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Paulo KowalskiHead and Neck Surgery Department and LIM 28, University of São Paulo Medical School (FMUSP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. luiz.kowalski@hc.fm.usp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-0481-156X
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

Fapesp 2021/14585-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aim of this overview is to appraise the evidence on salivary biomarkers for H&N cancer diagnosis. The acronym PICOS was used to develop the eligibility criteria and the focused review question: are liquid biopsies (saliva biomarkers) reliable for cancer detection in H&N cancer patients? Electronic database search encompassed PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and LILACS. Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed through AMSTAR 2. RECENT

findingsA total of 20 SRs were included. Only seven SRs were able to reach more solid conclusions around the retrieved findings by calculating the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and the overall area under the curve (AUC). Despite the limitations, significant RoB, and lack of test metrics in primary studies, all SRs recognize and encourage the potential role of saliva in the early diagnosis of oral cancer.

Indexed as

Mouth NeoplasmsBiomarkersEarly Detection of CancerHumansLiquid BiopsySystematic Reviews as TopicBiomarkersEarly diagnosisLiquid biopsyOral potentially malignant disordersOral squamous cell carcinomaSalivaomicsSalivary biomarkersSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID36790668
OpenAlexW4320857149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.