ArticleJournal of ultrasound2024
Shear wave elastography ultrasound does not quantify mechanical properties of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo validate shear wave elastography (SWE) stiffness measurements for the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow compared to mechanical measurements. MATERIALS AND
methodsEleven fresh frozen human cadaveric upper extremities were evaluated by a musculoskeletal-specialized radiologist to provide SWE measurements used to calculate stiffness at 4 points along the anterior band of the UCL at various load states and flexion angles. Specimens were then dissected and optical markers were placed on the UCL to track displacement during applied force by a load frame, thereby providing measurements to calculate the mechanical stiffness. These two stiffness values were compared by ANOVA for all load states and flexion angles.
resultsMeasurements of stiffness by SWE for the UCL were three orders of magnitude smaller than the true mechanical testing stiffness and no correlations between SWE and mechanical measurements of stiffness were found at 30, 60 or 90 degrees of elbow flexion (R
conclusionsSWE stiffness did not correlate with mechanical measurements. Clinical utility of musculoskeletal SWE may be better defined when biomechanical properties or clinical outcomes can be correlated with SWE measurements. The ultimate clinical utility of SWE in musculoskeletal tissues may be qualitative, as demonstrated by differences throughout the length of the UCL in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.