Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790641›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2023

Accessibility percolation on Cartesian power graphs.

Benjamin Schmiegelt, Joachim Krug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin SchmiegeltInstitute for Biological Physics, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.
Joachim KrugInstitute for Biological Physics, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany. jkrug@uni-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2143-6490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fitness landscape is a mapping from a space of discrete genotypes to the real numbers. A path in a fitness landscape is a sequence of genotypes connected by single mutational steps. Such a path is said to be accessible if the fitness values of the genotypes encountered along the path increase monotonically. We study accessible paths on random fitness landscapes of the House-of-Cards type, on which fitness values are independent, identically and continuously distributed random variables. The genotype space is taken to be a Cartesian power graph [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the number of genetic loci and the allele graph [Formula: see text] encodes the possible allelic states and mutational transitions on one locus. The probability of existence of accessible paths between two genotypes at a distance linear in [Formula: see text] displays a transition from 0 to a positive value at a threshold [Formula: see text] for the fitness difference between the initial and final genotype. We derive a lower bound on [Formula: see text] for general [Formula: see text] and show that this bound is tight for a large class of allele graphs. Our results generalize previous results for accessibility percolation on the biallelic hypercube, and compare favorably to published numerical results for multiallelic Hamming graphs.

Indexed as

MutationGenotypeProbabilityAdaptive walksFitness landscapeGenotype graphPercolation

Identifiers

PMID36790641
PMCPMC9931871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.