Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790614›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2023

A next generation mathematical model for the in vitro to clinical translation of T-cell engagers.

David Flowers, David Bassen, Georgi I Kapitanov, Diana Marcantonio, John M Burke, Joshua F Apgar, Alison Betts, Fei Hua

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Future Directions for Quantitative Systems Pharmacology.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David Flowers *Applied BioMath, Concord, MA, USA.
David Bassen *Applied BioMath, Concord, MA, USA.
Georgi I KapitanovApplied BioMath, Concord, MA, USA.
Diana MarcantonioApplied BioMath, Concord, MA, USA.
John M BurkeApplied BioMath, Concord, MA, USA.
Joshua F ApgarApplied BioMath, Concord, MA, USA.
Alison Betts
Fei HuaApplied BioMath, Concord, MA, USA. fei.hua@appliedbiomath.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T-cell engager (TCE) molecules activate the immune system and direct it to kill tumor cells. The key mechanism of action of TCEs is to crosslink CD3 on T cells and tumor associated antigens (TAAs) on tumor cells. The formation of this trimolecular complex (i.e. trimer) mimics the immune synapse, leading to therapeutic-dependent T-cell activation and killing of tumor cells. Computational models supporting TCE development must predict trimer formation accurately. Here, we present a next-generation two-step binding mathematical model for TCEs to describe trimer formation. Specifically, we propose to model the second binding step with trans-avidity and as a two-dimensional (2D) process where the reactants are modeled as the cell-surface density. Compared to the 3D binding model where the reactants are described in terms of concentration, the 2D model predicts less sensitivity of trimer formation to varying cell densities, which better matches changes in EC

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalT-LymphocytesAvidityBispecificBlinatumomabChi factorMathematical modelQSPT-cell engager

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.