Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2023
Erythema nodosum in children: a cohort study from a tertiary pediatric hospital in Italy.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [The skin as a mirror of an internal disease-erythema nodosum and Crohn's disease].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Unexpected erythema nodosum during dupilumab treatment for severe asthma: Causal or casual?JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- Celiac Disease Presenting With Erythema Nodosum in a Child: Case Report and Review of the Literature.Case reports in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Erythema nodosum as a rare presentation of pulmonary tuberculosis in adolescents: A case report.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2026Article
- Erythema nodosum in northern Finland between 1996 and 2019: A register-based study.The Journal of dermatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erythema nodosum (EN), although relatively uncommon in the pediatric population, is the most frequent type of panniculitis in children. The present study aimed to report all the cases of children admitted to our tertiary pediatric hospital with the diagnosis of EN to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, etiology, treatment, and the course of this disease in the pediatric age. This observational study retrospectively considered all children evaluated to the emergency room (ER) of Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy, discharged with a diagnosis of EN over a 12-year period (from January 2009 to December 2021). Clinical and laboratory data were recorded using a standardized report form. Sixty-eight patients with EN were included. The etiologic diagnosis of EN was made in 38 children (55.9%): 29 (42.6%) had infection-related EN (in particular EBV and β-hemolytic streptococcus), 6 (8.8%) had Crohn's disease, 1 celiac disease, 1 Sjogren syndrome, and 1 Hodgkin lymphoma. In 30 patients (45%), no definitive diagnosis was reached, and they were defined as having idiopathic EN. Most of the laboratory tests were nonspecific. No statistical differences were found in the demographic and clinical data, and the main diagnostic laboratory parameters between patients with idiopathic EN versus those with secondary EN. Conclusion: Since EN can be isolated or the first manifestation of heterogeneous underlying pathologies, some of which can be severe and life-threatening, it is important to recognize it and carry out all the necessary etiological diagnostic investigations to understand its etiology and start the specific treatment. What is Known: • Erythema nodosum (EN) is the most frequent type of panniculitis in children. • It has been associated with a wide spectrum of disorders, such as different types of infection, malignancies, chronic inflammations, and drugs. What is New: • No statistical differences can be found in clinical features as well as laboratory data, between patients with idiopathic EN versus those with secondary EN. • A broad spectrum of investigations and a proper follow-up should be taken into account in order to prevent a delayed or missed secondary EN diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.