Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790469›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

An ordinal radiomic model to predict the differentiation grade of invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma based on low-dose computed tomography in lung cancer screening.

Yong Li, Jieke Liu, Xi Yang, Ai Wang, Chi Zang, Lu Wang, Changjiu He, Libo Lin, Haomiao Qing, Jing Ren and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong Li *Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Jieke Liu *Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Xi YangDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Ai WangDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Chi ZangDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Lu WangDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Changjiu HeDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Libo LinDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Haomiao QingDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Jing RenDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Peng ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. penghyzhou@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-6088
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

Chengdu Science and Technology Program 2021-YF05-01507-SNNational Natural Science Foundation of China 82202141Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2021YFS0075Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2021YFS0225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo construct a radiomic model of low-dose CT (LDCT) to predict the differentiation grade of invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma (IPA) and compare its diagnostic performance with quantitative-semantic model and radiologists.

methodsA total of 682 pulmonary nodules were divided into the primary cohort (181 grade 1; 254 grade 2; 64 grade 3) and validation cohort (69 grade 1; 99 grade 2; 15 grade 3) according to scanners. The radiomic and quantitative-semantic models were built using ordinal logistic regression. The diagnostic performance of the models and radiologists was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and accuracy.

resultsThe radiomic model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in the validation cohort (AUC, 0.900 (95%CI: 0.847-0.939) for Grade 1 vs. Grade 2/Grade 3; AUC, 0.929 (95%CI: 0.882-0.962) for Grade 1/Grade 2 vs. Grade 3; accuracy, 0.803 (95%CI: 0.737-0.857)). No significant difference in diagnostic performance was found between the radiomic model and radiological expert (AUC, 0.840 (95%CI: 0.779-0.890) for Grade 1 vs. Grade 2/Grade 3, p = 0.130; AUC, 0.852 (95%CI: 0.793-0.900) for Grade 1/Grade 2 vs. Grade 3, p = 0.170; accuracy, 0.743 (95%CI: 0.673-0.804), p = 0.079), but the radiomic model outperformed the quantitative-semantic model and inexperienced radiologists (all p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe radiomic model of LDCT can be used to predict the differentiation grade of IPA in lung cancer screening, and its diagnostic performance is comparable to that of radiological expert. KEY POINTS: • Early identifying the novel differentiation grade of invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma may provide guidance for further surveillance, surgical strategy, or more adjuvant treatment. • The diagnostic performance of the radiomic model is comparable to that of a radiological expert and superior to that of the quantitative-semantic model and inexperienced radiologists. • The radiomic model of low-dose CT can be used to predict the differentiation grade of invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma in lung cancer screening.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansLungRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdenocarcinoma of lungBiomarkersDiagnostic imagingTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID36790469
OpenAlexW4320857617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.