Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790460›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023

Analytical applications of smartphones for agricultural soil analysis.

Marek Tobiszewski, Christina Vakh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marek TobiszewskiDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Chemical Faculty and EcoTech Center, Gdańsk University of Technology (GUT), Ul. G. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233, Gdańsk, Poland. marek.tobiszewski@pg.edu.pl.
Christina VakhDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Chemical Faculty and EcoTech Center, Gdańsk University of Technology (GUT), Ul. G. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233, Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil is one of the most important farming resources. Appropriate managing of its quality promotes productive and sustainable agriculture. The valuable farm practice in soil quality managing is based on regular soil analysis with the aim of determining the exact amount of nutrients or other chemical, physical, and biological soil properties. Soil analysis usually requires sample collection at the desired sampling depth followed by sample delivery to chemical laboratories. However, laboratory analyses are resource-intensive and costly, and require a lot of time, effort, and equipment. A low-cost, fast, and effective alternative for soil quality control is the application of smartphones to perform chemical analyses directly in the field or on the farm. In this paper, an overview of recent developments on smartphone-based methodologies for agricultural purposes and portable evaluation of soil quality and its properties is presented. The discussion focuses on recent applications of smartphone-based devices for the determination of basic soil parameters, content of organic matter, mineral fertilizers, and organic or inorganic pollutants. Obvious advantages of using smartphones, such as convenience and simplicity of use, and the main shortcomings, such as relatively poor precision of the results obtained, are also discussed. The general trend shows the huge interest from researchers to move the technology into the field with the aim of providing cost-effective and rapid soil analysis. This paper can broaden the understanding of using smartphones for chemical analysis of soil samples, as it is a relatively new area and is expected to be developed rapidly.

Indexed as

SmartphoneSoilAgricultureFertilizersMineralsNutrientsFertilizersMineralsNutrientsSoilAgricultureChemical analysisRGB modelSmartphoneSoil qualitySpectrophotometry

Identifiers

PMID36790460
PMCPMC10328891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.