Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790430›Full record

SynthesisMicrobial genomics2023

A systematic review of economic evaluations of whole-genome sequencing for the surveillance of bacterial pathogens.

Vivien Price, Lucky Gift Ngwira, Joseph M Lewis, Kate S Baker, Sharon J Peacock, Elita Jauneikaite, Nicholas Feasey

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Microbial genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evaluating the use of whole-genome sequencing and SangerJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Real-Time Genomic Surveillance for Enhanced Healthcare Outbreak Detection and Control: Clinical and Economic Impact.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Whole-genome sequencing surveillance of vancomycin-resistantInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vivien PriceUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Lucky Gift NgwiraMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Joseph M LewisUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Kate S BakerUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sharon J PeacockUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Elita JauneikaiteImperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas FeaseyLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203919/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has unparalleled ability to distinguish between bacteria, with many public health applications. The generation and analysis of WGS data require significant financial investment. We describe a systematic review summarizing economic analyses of genomic surveillance of bacterial pathogens, reviewing the evidence for economic viability. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021289030). Six databases were searched on 8 November 2021 using terms related to 'WGS', 'population surveillance' and 'economic analysis'. Quality was assessed with the Drummond-Jefferson checklist. Following data extraction, a narrative synthesis approach was taken. Six hundred and eighty-one articles were identified, of which 49 proceeded to full-text screening, with 9 selected for inclusion. All had been published since 2019. Heterogeneity was high. Five studies assessed WGS for hospital surveillance and four analysed foodborne pathogens. Four were cost-benefit analyses, one was a cost-utility analysis, one was a cost-effectiveness analysis, one was a combined cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis, one combined cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses and one was a partial analysis. All studies supported the use of WGS as a surveillance tool on economic grounds. The available evidence supports the use of WGS for pathogen surveillance but is limited by marked heterogeneity. Further work should include analysis relevant to low- and middle-income countries and should use real-world effectiveness data.

Indexed as

BacteriaCost-Effectiveness AnalysisCost-Benefit AnalysisGenomicsWhole Genome Sequencingantimicrobial resistanceeconomic evaluationfoodborne pathogensinfection prevention and controlsystematic reviewwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36790430
PMCPMC9997737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.