Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790345›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2023

Adjunctive cenobamate in highly active and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy: A "real-world" retrospective study.

Javier Peña-Ceballos, Patrick B Moloney, Tudor Munteanu, Michael Doyle, Niamh Colleran, Brenda Liggan, Annette Breen, Sinead Murphy, Hany El-Naggar, Peter Widdess-Walsh and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Cenobamate: An Appraisal Five Years On.Neurology and therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cenobamate as add-on treatment in ultra-refractory focal epilepsy: Real-world results from The Danish Epilepsy Centre, Dianalund, Denmark.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Javier Peña-CeballosDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Patrick B MoloneyDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0997-2087
Tudor MunteanuDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael DoyleDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Niamh ColleranDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Brenda LigganDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Annette BreenDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Sinead MurphyDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Hany El-NaggarDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-5273
Peter Widdess-WalshDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4217-2575
Norman DelantyDepartment of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3953-9842
Beaumont Hospital · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent clinical trials have shown that cenobamate substantially improves seizure control in focal-onset drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, little is known about cenobamate's performance in highly active (≥20 seizures/month) and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy (≥6 failed epilepsy treatments, including antiseizure medications [ASMs], epilepsy surgery, and vagus nerve stimulation). Here, we studied cenobamate's efficacy and tolerability in a "real-world" severe DRE cohort.

methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive adults treated with cenobamate between October 2020 and September 2022. All patients received cenobamate through an Early Access Program. Cenobamate retention, seizure outcomes, treatment-emergent adverse events, and adjustments to concomitant ASMs were analyzed.

resultsFifty-seven patients received cenobamate for at least 3 months (median duration, 11 months). The median cenobamate dose was 250 mg/day (range 75-350 mg). Baseline demographics were consistent with highly active (median seizure frequency, 60/month) and ultra-refractory epilepsy (median previously failed ASMs, nine). Most (87.8%) had prior epilepsy surgery and/or vagus nerve stimulation. Six patients stopped cenobamate due to lack of efficacy and/or adverse events. One patient died from factors unrelated to cenobamate. Among patients who continued cenobamate, three achieved seizure freedom (5.3% of cohort), 24 had a 75%-99% reduction in seizures (42.1% of cohort), and 16 had a 50%-74% reduction (28.1% of cohort). Cenobamate led to abolition of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures in 55.6% (20/36) of patients. Among treatment responders, 67.4% (29/43) were treated with cenobamate doses of ≥250 mg/day. Three-fourths of patients reported at least one side-effect, most commonly fatigue and somnolence. Adverse events most commonly emerged at cenobamate doses of ≥250 mg/day. Side-effects were partially manageable by reducing the overall ASM burden, most often clobazam, eslicarbazepine, and perampanel. SIGNIFICANCE: Patients with highly active and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy experienced meaningful seizure outcomes on cenobamate. Emergence of adverse events at doses above 250 mg/day may limit the potential for further improvements in seizure control at higher cenobamate doses.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsies, PartialAdultCarbamatesChlorophenolsHumansRetrospective StudiesSeizuresTetrazolesCarbamatesCenobamateChlorophenolsTetrazolescenobamatedrug-resistant epilepsyfocal epilepsyhighly active epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID36790345
OpenAlexW4320856353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.