Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790230›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2023

Comparison of sexual functions in women with and without type 1 diabetes.

Selda Celik, Meltem Demirgöz Bal, Meral Kelleci

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Selda CelikUniversity of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing - Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-3189
Meltem Demirgöz BalMarmara University, Health Sciences Faculty, Midwifery Department - Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4009-7137
Meral KelleciCumhuriyet University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department - Sivas, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8853-4645
Izmir University · TRMarmara University · TRSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate female sexual function in patients with type 1 diabetes by comparing female sexual function index scores between women with and without type 1 diabetes.

methodsA total of 62 women with type 1 diabetes and 69 age-matched women without diabetes but with similar backgrounds were enrolled in the patient and control groups, respectively. All participants were sexually active and had no systemic diseases other than diabetes in the patient group.

resultsThe frequency of female sexual dysfunction was significantly higher, and the mean female sexual function index score was significantly lower in women with diabetes compared to the control group (p=0.01). There was a significant relationship between sexual dysfunction and duration of diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin test, and body mass index (p<0.05).

conclusionThis study demonstrates that female sexual dysfunction is more common among women with type 1 diabetes than among women without type 1 diabetes. Patients with type 1 diabetes should be evaluated in terms of sexual health. Health professionals should give more attention to and provide guidance regarding sexual function in women with type 1 diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Sexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36790230
PMCPMC9983465
OpenAlexW4319960932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.