Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790192›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

German Health Update Fokus (GEDA Fokus) among Residents with Croatian, Italian, Polish, Syrian, or Turkish Citizenship in Germany: Protocol for a Multilingual Mixed-Mode Interview Survey.

Carmen Koschollek, Marie-Luise Zeisler, Robin A Houben, Julia Geerlings, Katja Kajikhina, Marleen Bug, Miriam Blume, Robert Hoffmann, Marcel Hintze, Ronny Kuhnert and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carmen KoschollekDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2186-1072
Marie-Luise ZeislerDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1227-7640
Robin A HoubenDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-7794
Julia GeerlingsDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4637-9741
Katja KajikhinaDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4366-1410
Marleen BugDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3938-5396
Miriam BlumeDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-2172
Robert HoffmannDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-6717
Marcel HintzeDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7324-1695
Ronny KuhnertDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6617-8475
Antje GößwaldDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5285-0750
Patrick SchmichDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-0786
Claudia HövenerDepartment for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5994-7715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGermany has a long history of migration. In 2020, more than 1 person in every 4 people had a statistically defined, so-called migration background in Germany, meaning that the person or at least one of their parents was born with a citizenship other than German citizenship. People with a history of migration are not represented proportionately to the population within public health monitoring at the Robert Koch Institute, thus impeding differentiated analyses of migration and health. To develop strategies for improving the inclusion of people with a history of migration in health surveys, we conducted a feasibility study in 2018. The lessons learned were implemented in the health interview survey German Health Update (Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell [GEDA]) Fokus, which was conducted among people with selected citizenships representing the major migrant groups in Germany.

objectiveGEDA Fokus aimed to collect comprehensive data on the health status and social, migration-related, and structural factors among people with selected citizenships to enable differentiated explanations of the associations between migration-related aspects and their impact on migrant health.

methodsGEDA Fokus is an interview survey among people with Croatian, Italian, Polish, Syrian, or Turkish citizenship living in Germany aged 18-79 years, with a targeted sample size of 1200 participants per group. The gross sample of 33,436 people was drawn from the residents' registration offices of 99 German municipalities based on citizenship. Sequentially, multiple modes of administration were offered. The questionnaire was available for self-administration (web-based and paper-based); in larger municipalities, personal or phone interviews were possible later on. Study documents and the questionnaire were bilingual-in German and the respective translation language depending on the citizenship. Data were collected from November 2021 to May 2022.

resultsOverall, 6038 respondents participated in the survey, of whom 2983 (49.4%) were female. The median age was 39 years; the median duration of residence in Germany was 10 years, with 19.69% (1189/6038) of the sample being born in Germany. The overall response rate was 18.4% (American Association for Public Opinion Research [AAPOR] response rate 1) and was 6.8% higher in the municipalities where personal interviews were offered (19.3% vs 12.5%). Overall, 78.12% (4717/6038) of the participants self-administered the questionnaire, whereas 21.88% (1321/6038) took part in personal interviews. In total, 41.85% (2527/6038) of the participants answered the questionnaire in the German language only, 16.69% (1008/6038) exclusively used the translation.

conclusionsOffering different modes of administration, as well as multiple study languages, enabled us to recruit a heterogeneous sample of people with a history of migration. The data collected will allow differentiated analyses of the role and interplay of migration-related and social determinants of health and their impact on the health status of people with selected citizenships. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/43503.

Indexed as

hard-to-surveyhealth inequalitiesinterview surveymigrationmixed-modemultilingual

Identifiers

PMID36790192
PMCPMC10134013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.