Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36790136›Full record

ReviewMolecular plant pathology2023

Beyond the genomes of Fulvia fulva (syn. Cladosporium fulvum) and Dothistroma septosporum: New insights into how these fungal pathogens interact with their host plants.

Carl H Mesarich, Irene Barnes, Ellie L Bradley, Silvia de la Rosa, Pierre J G M de Wit, Yanan Guo, Scott A Griffiths, Richard C Hamelin, Matthieu H A J Joosten, Mengmeng Lu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular plant pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A latent invader: transcriptomics revealsFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Carl H MesarichLaboratory of Molecular Plant Pathology, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5207-4074
Irene BarnesDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4349-3402
Ellie L BradleyLaboratory of Molecular Plant Pathology, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3699-4305
Silvia de la RosaLaboratory of Molecular Plant Pathology, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Pierre J G M de WitLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Yanan GuoBioprotection Aotearoa, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9584-6153
Scott A GriffithsLazarus Bio Ltd, Llanelli, UK.
Richard C HamelinDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Matthieu H A J JoostenLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6243-4547
Mengmeng LuDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5023-3759
Hannah M McCarthyLaboratory of Molecular Plant Pathology, School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1966-1952
Christiaan R ScholLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8807-6699
Ioannis StergiopoulosDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2368-6119
Mariana TaralloLaboratory of Molecular Plant Pathology, School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Alex Z ZaccaronDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5554-2059
Rosie E BradshawBioprotection Aotearoa, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5228-2685
Massey University · NZUniversity of California, Davis · USWageningen University & Research · NLGraduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NLPrince Philip Hospital · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fulvia fulva and Dothistroma septosporum are closely related apoplastic pathogens with similar lifestyles but different hosts: F. fulva is a pathogen of tomato, whilst D. septosporum is a pathogen of pine trees. In 2012, the first genome sequences of these pathogens were published, with F. fulva and D. septosporum having highly fragmented and near-complete assemblies, respectively. Since then, significant advances have been made in unravelling their genome architectures. For instance, the genome of F. fulva has now been assembled into 14 chromosomes, 13 of which have synteny with the 14 chromosomes of D. septosporum, suggesting these pathogens are even more closely related than originally thought. Considerable advances have also been made in the identification and functional characterization of virulence factors (e.g., effector proteins and secondary metabolites) from these pathogens, thereby providing new insights into how they promote host colonization or activate plant defence responses. For example, it has now been established that effector proteins from both F. fulva and D. septosporum interact with cell-surface immune receptors and co-receptors to activate the plant immune system. Progress has also been made in understanding how F. fulva and D. septosporum have evolved with their host plants, whilst intensive research into pandemics of Dothistroma needle blight in the Northern Hemisphere has shed light on the origins, migration, and genetic diversity of the global D. septosporum population. In this review, we specifically summarize advances made in our understanding of the F. fulva-tomato and D. septosporum-pine pathosystems over the last 10 years.

Indexed as

AscomycotaCladosporiumHost Microbial InteractionsPinusGenome, FungalDothistroma needle blight (DNB)effector proteinsgenome sequenceshost susceptibility and resistancepathogen diversitysecondary metabolitestomato leaf mould

Identifiers

PMID36790136
PMCPMC10098069
OpenAlexW4320856139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.