ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2023
New Approach Methodologies for the Endocrine Activity Toolbox: Environmental Assessment for Fish and Amphibians.
Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of in vitro approaches for assessing the toxicity of chemical stressors across diverse physiological systems.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Review
- Article
- Eleutheroembryo-based new approach methodologies for endocrine and metabolic endpoints: a comment on Christou et al. (2026).NAM journal · 2026Article
- Review
- In Silico Identification of Molecular Interactions of the Emerging Contaminant Octyl Methoxycinnamate (OMC) on HPT Axis: Implications for Humans and Zebrafish.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Computational characterisation of ecological hazard and risk of environmental mixtures.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Navigating complexity in modern toxicology: the role of omics in short-term in vivo studies.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Endocrine-Disrupting Potential of Plant-Derived Compounds: An Ecotoxicological Review.Toxins · 2025Review
- Cross-species comparisons of plasma binding and considerations for data evaluation.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2025Article
- Screening for Endocrine Bioactivity Potential of Tobacco Product Chemicals Including Flavor Chemicals.Environmental toxicology · 2025Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in the Development and Adoption of New Approach Methods (NAMs).Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Article
- Big Question to Developing Solutions: A Decade of Progress in the Development of Aquatic New Approach Methodologies from 2012 to 2022.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple in vivo test guidelines focusing on the estrogen, androgen, thyroid, and steroidogenesis pathways have been developed and validated for mammals, amphibians, or fish. However, these tests are resource-intensive and often use a large number of laboratory animals. Developing alternatives for in vivo tests is consistent with the replacement, reduction, and refinement principles for animal welfare considerations, which are supported by increasing mandates to move toward an "animal-free" testing paradigm worldwide. New approach methodologies (NAMs) hold great promise to identify molecular, cellular, and tissue changes that can be used to predict effects reliably and more efficiently at the individual level (and potentially on populations) while reducing the number of animals used in (eco)toxicological testing for endocrine disruption. In a collaborative effort, experts from government, academia, and industry met in 2020 to discuss the current challenges of testing for endocrine activity assessment for fish and amphibians. Continuing this cross-sector initiative, our review focuses on the current state of the science regarding the use of NAMs to identify chemical-induced endocrine effects. The present study highlights the challenges of using NAMs for safety assessment and what work is needed to reduce their uncertainties and increase their acceptance in regulatory processes. We have reviewed the current NAMs available for endocrine activity assessment including in silico, in vitro, and eleutheroembryo models. New approach methodologies can be integrated as part of a weight-of-evidence approach for hazard or risk assessment using the adverse outcome pathway framework. The development and utilization of NAMs not only allows for replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal testing but can also provide robust and fit-for-purpose methods to identify chemicals acting via endocrine mechanisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:757-777. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.