Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36789969›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2023

New Approach Methodologies for the Endocrine Activity Toolbox: Environmental Assessment for Fish and Amphibians.

Constance A Mitchell, Natalie Burden, Mark Bonnell, Markus Hecker, Thomas H Hutchinson, Magdalena Jagla, Carlie A LaLone, Laurent Lagadic, Scott G Lynn, Bryon Shore and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review of in vitro approaches for assessing the toxicity of chemical stressors across diverse physiological systems.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Navigating complexity in modern toxicology: the role of omics in short-term in vivo studies.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Cross-species comparisons of plasma binding and considerations for data evaluation.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Constance A MitchellThe Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1052-7087
Natalie BurdenNational Centre for the 3Rs (NC3Rs), London, United Kingdom.
Mark BonnellEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Markus HeckerToxicology Centre and School of the Environment & Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Thomas H HutchinsonReckitt R&D, Hull, United Kingdom.
Magdalena JaglaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Carlie A LaLoneOffice of Research and Development, Great Lakes Toxicology & Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3174-1314
Laurent LagadicResearch and Development, Crop Science, Environmental Safety, Bayer, Monheim am Rhein, Germany.
Scott G LynnOffice of Pesticide Programs, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Bryon ShoreEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
You SongNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8523-3513
Sara M VlietOffice of Research and Development, Scientific Computing and Data Curation Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-0771
James R WheelerCorteva Agriscience, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands.
Michelle R EmbryThe Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CAHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute · USBayer (Germany) · DECorteva (United States) · USNational Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research · GBNorwegian Institute for Water Research · NOReckitt Benckiser (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple in vivo test guidelines focusing on the estrogen, androgen, thyroid, and steroidogenesis pathways have been developed and validated for mammals, amphibians, or fish. However, these tests are resource-intensive and often use a large number of laboratory animals. Developing alternatives for in vivo tests is consistent with the replacement, reduction, and refinement principles for animal welfare considerations, which are supported by increasing mandates to move toward an "animal-free" testing paradigm worldwide. New approach methodologies (NAMs) hold great promise to identify molecular, cellular, and tissue changes that can be used to predict effects reliably and more efficiently at the individual level (and potentially on populations) while reducing the number of animals used in (eco)toxicological testing for endocrine disruption. In a collaborative effort, experts from government, academia, and industry met in 2020 to discuss the current challenges of testing for endocrine activity assessment for fish and amphibians. Continuing this cross-sector initiative, our review focuses on the current state of the science regarding the use of NAMs to identify chemical-induced endocrine effects. The present study highlights the challenges of using NAMs for safety assessment and what work is needed to reduce their uncertainties and increase their acceptance in regulatory processes. We have reviewed the current NAMs available for endocrine activity assessment including in silico, in vitro, and eleutheroembryo models. New approach methodologies can be integrated as part of a weight-of-evidence approach for hazard or risk assessment using the adverse outcome pathway framework. The development and utilization of NAMs not only allows for replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal testing but can also provide robust and fit-for-purpose methods to identify chemicals acting via endocrine mechanisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:757-777. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsAmphibiansAnimalsEcotoxicologyEndocrine SystemFishesMammalsRisk AssessmentEndocrine DisruptorsAdverse outcome pathwayEndocrine-disrupting compoundsIn vitro toxicology

Identifiers

PMID36789969
PMCPMC10258674
OpenAlexW4320857614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.