Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36789916›Full record

SynthesisBMJ mental health2023

Comparison of antipsychotic dose equivalents for acute bipolar mania and schizophrenia.

Chia-Ling Yu, Andre F Carvalho, Trevor Thompson, Tzu-Cheng Tsai, Ping-Tao Tseng, Chih-Wei Hsu, Tien-Wei Hsu, Chih-Sung Liang

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Chia-Ling YuDepartment of Pharmacy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taipei, Taiwan.
Andre F CarvalhoIMPACT (Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment) Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Trevor ThompsonCentre for Chronic Illness and Ageing, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Tzu-Cheng TsaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ping-Tao TsengProspect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5761-7800
Chih-Wei HsuDeaparment of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Branch, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8650-4060
Tien-Wei Hsu *Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan lcsyfw@gmail.com twhsu@vghks.gov.tw.
Chih-Sung Liang *Department of Psychiatry, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan lcsyfw@gmail.com twhsu@vghks.gov.tw.ORCID 0000-0003-1138-5586
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWDeakin University · AUKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Defense Medical Center · TWNational Sun Yat-sen University · TWUniversity of Greenwich · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

questionAre antipsychotic dose equivalents between acute mania and schizophrenia the same? STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six databases were systematically searched (from inception to 17 September 2022) to identify blinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that used a flexible-dose oral antipsychotic drug for patients with acute mania. The mean and SD of the effective dose and the pre-post changes in manic symptoms were extracted. A network meta-analysis (NMA) under a frequentist framework was performed to examine the comparative efficacy between the antipsychotics. A classic mean dose method (sample size weighted) was used to calculate each antipsychotic dose equivalent to 1 mg/day olanzapine for acute mania. The antipsychotic dose equivalents of acute mania were compared with published data for schizophrenia.

findingsWe included 42 RCTs which enrolled 11 396 participants with acute mania. The NMA showed that risperidone was superior to olanzapine (reported standardised mean difference: -022, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.02), while brexpiprazole was inferior to olanzapine (standardised mean difference: 0.36, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.64). The dose equivalents to olanzapine (with SD) were 0.68 (0.23) for haloperidol, 0.32 (0.07) for risperidone, 0.60 (0.11) for paliperidone, 8.00 (1.41) for ziprasidone, 41.46 (5.98) for quetiapine, 1.65 (0.32) for aripiprazole, 1.23 (0.20) for asenapine, 0.53 (0.14) for cariprazine and 0.22 (0.03) for brexpiprazole. Compared with the olanzapine dose equivalents for schizophrenia, those of acute mania were higher for quetiapine (p<0.001, 28.5%) and aripiprazole (p<0.001, 17.0%), but lower for haloperidol (p<0.001, -8.1%) and risperidone (p<0.001, -15.8%).

conclusionsAntipsychotic drugs have been considered first-line treatment for acute mania, warranting specific dose equivalence for scientific and clinical purposes.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderSchizophreniaAripiprazoleHaloperidolHumansManiaOlanzapineQuetiapine FumarateQuinolonesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisperidoneThiophenesAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazolebrexpiprazoleHaloperidolOlanzapineQuetiapine FumarateQuinolonesRisperidoneThiophenesAdult psychiatryDepression & mood disorders

Identifiers

PMID36789916
PMCPMC10035777
OpenAlexW4319345949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.