Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36789776›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

Measuring recovery-oriented rehabilitation language in clinical documentation to enhance recovery-oriented practice.

Veronica De Monte, Angus Veitch, Frances Dark, Carla Meurk, Marianne Wyder, Maddison Wheeler, Kylie Carney, Stephen Parker, Steve Kisely, Dan Siskind

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Veronica De MonteMobile Intensive Rehabilitation Team, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Woolloongabba, Queenland, Australia.
Angus VeitchDepartment of Media and Communications, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Frances DarkMobile Intensive Rehabilitation Team, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Woolloongabba, Queenland, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Carla MeurkFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park, Wacol, Queensland, Australia.
Marianne WyderResearch and Learning Network, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Mt Gravatt, Queensland, Australia.
Maddison WheelerMobile Intensive Rehabilitation Team, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Woolloongabba, Queenland, Australia.
Kylie CarneyMobile Intensive Rehabilitation Team, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Woolloongabba, Queenland, Australia.
Stephen ParkerFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and Research and Learning Network, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Mt Gravatt, Queensland, Australia.
Steve KiselyFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and Research and Learning Network, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Mt Gravatt, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4021-2924
Dan SiskindMobile Intensive Rehabilitation Team, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Woolloongabba, Queenland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park, Wacol, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-9216

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1194635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health services are encouraged to use language consistent with principles of recovery-oriented practice. This study presents a novel approach for identifying whether clinical documentation contains recovery-oriented rehabilitation language, and evaluates an intervention to improve the language used within a community-based rehabilitation team.

aimsThis is a pilot study of training to enhance recovery-oriented rehabilitation language written in care review summaries, as measured through a text-based analysis of language used in mental health clinical documentation.

methodEleven case managers participated in a programme that included instruction in recovery-oriented rehabilitation principles. Outcomes were measured with automated textual analysis of clinical documentation, using a custom-built dictionary of rehabilitation-consistent, person-centred and pejorative terms. Automated analyses were run on Konstanz Information Miner (KNIME), an open-source data analytics platform. Differences in the frequency of term categories in 50 pre-training and 77 post-training documents were analysed with inferential statistics.

resultsThe average percentage of sentences with recovery-oriented rehabilitation terms increased from 37% before the intervention to 48% afterward, a relative increase of 28% (

conclusionsThis computer-driven textual analysis method identified improvements in recovery-oriented rehabilitation language following training. Our study suggests that brief interventions can affect the language of clinical documentation, and that automated text-analysis may represent a promising approach for rapidly assessing recovery-oriented rehabilitation language in mental health services.

Indexed as

community mental health teamsdocumentationlanguageRecoveryrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36789776
PMCPMC9970174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.