Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36789668›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2023

The Role of Physician Specialty in the Underutilization of Standard-of-Care Treatment Intensification in Patients With Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Umang Swami, Agnes Hong, Nader N El-Chaar, Krishnan Ramaswamy, Brandon J Diessner, Cori J Blauer-Peterson, Rickard Sandin, David Nimke, Neeraj Agarwal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Editorial Comment.The Journal of urology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Umang SwamiHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-3518-0411
Agnes HongPfizer Inc, New York, New York (formerly at Astellas Pharma Inc, Northbrook, Illinois).
Nader N El-ChaarAstellas Pharma Inc, Northbrook, Illinois.
Krishnan RamaswamyPfizer Inc, New York, New York.
Brandon J DiessnerOptum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
Cori J Blauer-PetersonPfizer Inc, New York, New York.
Rickard SandinPfizer AB, Sollentuna, Sweden.
David NimkeAstellas Pharma Inc, Northbrook, Illinois.
Neeraj AgarwalHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Astellas Pharma (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · USUniversity of Utah · USAstellas Pharma (Japan) · JPOptum (United States) · USPfizer (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluate utilization of treatment intensification of androgen deprivation therapy with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor/docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients across physician specialties. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study identified patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the Optum Research Database between 2014 and 2019. Adult men with ≥1 claim for metastatic disease within 90 days before or any time after the first prostate cancer claim who received androgen deprivation therapy were included. Physician specialty, determined from medical/pharmacy claims during each line of therapy, was categorized as urologist only, oncologist only, both (urologists and oncologists), or other (other specialties). Treatment intensification and patient characteristics were analyzed descriptively.

resultsOf 4,675 patients, 16% were treated by urologists only, 20% by oncologists only, 63% by both, and 1.1% by others. The most frequent first line of therapy was androgen deprivation therapy ± first-generation nonsteroidal antiandrogens (>50%). Androgen deprivation therapy + docetaxel use declined over time, while androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor pathway inhibitor use increased. Patients seen by oncologists or both were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and were likelier to receive treatment intensification compared to those treated by urologists. By 2019, however, treatment intensification remained <40% from oncologists only or both, and <15% from urologists only. In the second and third lines of therapy, androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor pathway inhibitor was the most prescribed regimen across specialties (>50%).

conclusionsTreatment intensification was underused in first lines of therapy across urology and oncology specialties despite evidence of improved survival. In subsequent lines, androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor pathway inhibitor was prescribed more frequently across specialties. These results underscore the need for earlier treatment intensification by urologists and oncologists.

Indexed as

PhysiciansProstatic NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAdultAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensCastrationDocetaxelHumansMaleReceptors, AndrogenRetrospective StudiesAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensDocetaxelReceptors, Androgenattitudeshealth knowledgephysicians'practicepractice patternsprofessional practice gapsprostatic neoplasmsstandard of care

Identifiers

PMID36789668
PMCPMC12721620
OpenAlexW4320857598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.