Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36789510›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2023

A parametric blueprint for optimum cochlear outer hair cell design.

Richard D Rabbitt, Tamara C Bidone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A parametric blueprint for optimum cochlear outer hair cell design.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard D RabbittBiomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 36 S Wasatch Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2959-7248
Tamara C BidoneBiomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 36 S Wasatch Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

Funding

Biophysics and Biomechanics of the Semicircular CanalsR01DC006685 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RABBITT, RICHARD D · 2005 to 2022
$6.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present work examines the hypothesis that cochlear outer hair cell (OHC) properties vary in precise proportions along the tonotopic map to optimize electromechanical power conversion. We tested this hypothesis using a very simple model of a single isolated OHC driving a mechanical load. Results identify three non-dimensional ratios that are predicted to optimize power conversion: the ratio of the resistive-capacitive (RC) corner to the characteristic frequency (CF), the ratio of nonlinear to linear capacitance and the ratio of OHC stiffness to cochlear load stiffness. Optimum efficiency requires all three ratios to be universal constants, independent of CF and species. The same ratios are cardinal control parameters that maximize power output by positioning the OHC operating point on the edge of a dynamic instability. Results support the hypothesis that OHC properties evolved to optimize electro-mechanical power conversion. Identification of the RC corner frequency as a control parameter reveals a powerful mechanism used by medial olivocochlear efferent system to control OHC power output. Results indicate the upper-frequency limit of OHC power output is not constrained by the speed of the motor itself but instead is probably limited by the size of the nucleus and membrane surface area available for ion-channel expression.

Indexed as

CochleaHair Cells, Auditory, OuterElectric Capacitancecell lengthcontrol parameterselectromechanicshearing frequency limitpiezoelectricity‌prestin

Identifiers

PMID36789510
PMCPMC9929500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.