ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2022
Impact of satellite blood culture on early diagnosis of sepsis.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Reporting and Dual-Card Testing in ICU Bloodstream Infections.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Shorter time-to-positivity and turnaround time with mycosis blood culture bottles when detecting Candida albicans.Infection · 2024Article
- Erratum to "Impact of satellite blood culture on early diagnosis of sepsis" [Journal of Intensive Medicine volume 2 (2022) 56-60].Journal of intensive medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether satellite blood culture (SBC) can improve turnaround times, antibiotic switching, and patient prognosis, relative to laboratory blood culture (LBC). . Methods: Patients with sepsis treated in the intensive care units (ICUs) of Henan Provincial People's Hospital from February 5, 2018 to January 19, 2019 who met the inclusion criteria were recruited to the study and divided into the SBC group and LBC group according to different blood culture methods. Patient demographics, blood culture, antibiotic adjustment, and prognosis data were collected and compared between the two groups. . Results: A total of 204 blood culture sets from 52 ICU patients, including 100 from the medical microbiology LBC group and 104 from the SBC group, were analyzed in this study. There was no significant difference in the positive rates between the two groups. Time from specimen collection to incubation was significantly shorter in the SBC group than that in the LBC group (1.65 h Conclusion: SBC can significantly reduce blood culture turnaround times; however, there were no significant differences between the two blood culture methods in initial reporting of positive cultures, time to adjustment of antibiotic therapy, or medical costs, despite a trend toward improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.