Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36789228›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2022

Analysis of the correlation between the longitudinal trajectory of SOFA scores and prognosis in patients with sepsis at 72 hour after admission based on group trajectory modeling.

Rui Yang, Didi Han, Luming Zhang, Tao Huang, Fengshuo Xu, Shuai Zheng, Haiyan Yin, Jun Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Longitudinal SOFA score trajectories and risk stratification in ICU patients withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. SOFA in sepsis: with or without GCS.European journal of medical research · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rui YangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Didi HanDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Luming ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Tao HuangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Fengshuo XuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Shuai ZhengDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Haiyan YinDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Jun LyuDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To identify the distinct trajectories of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores at 72 h for patients with sepsis in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database and determine their effects on mortality and adverse clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out involving patients with sepsis from the MIMIC-IV database. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) was used to identify the distinct trajectory groups for the SOFA scores in patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU). The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to investigate the relationship between the longitudinal change trajectory of the SOFA score and mortality and adverse clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 16,743 patients with sepsis were included in the cohort. The median survival age was 66 years (interquartile range: 54-76 years). The 7-day and 28-day in-hospital mortality were 6.0% and 17.6%, respectively. Five different trajectories of SOFA scores according to the model fitting standard were determined: group 1 (32.8%), group 2 (30.0%), group 3 (17.6%), group 4 (14.0%) and group 5 (5.7%). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that, for different clinical outcomes, trajectory group 1 was used as the reference, while trajectory groups 2-5 were all risk factors associated with the outcome ( Conclusion: This approach may help identify various groups of patients with sepsis, who may be at different levels of risk for adverse health outcomes, and provide subgroups with clinical importance.

Indexed as

Group-based trajectory modelMedical information mart for intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV databaseSepsisSequential organ failure assessment scoreSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID36789228
PMCPMC9923968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.