Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36789096›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2023

Comparison of Remimazolam Tosilate and Etomidate on Hemodynamics in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Bailong Hu, Mei Zhang, Zhen Wu, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Xiaohua Zou, Li Tan, Tao Song, Xingyu Li

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Safety of Remimazolam in Vulnerable Populations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bailong Hu *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1126-5381
Mei Zhang *College of Anesthesiology, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhen Wu *College of Anesthesiology, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyuan Zhang *College of Anesthesiology, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohua ZouDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Li TanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Tao SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Xingyu LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Guiyang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Remimazolam tosilate (RT) is a new ultrashort-acting γ-aminobutyric acid subtype A (GABA Methods: Patients were recruited from January to September 2022 in this single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. A total of 117 patients undergoing selective valve replacement surgery were randomly divided into low-dose RT (0.2 mg/kg) group (group LR), high-dose RT (0.3 mg/kg) group (group HR), or etomidate (1.5 mg/kg) group (group E), respectively. The primary outcome was hemodynamic fluctuations (mean arterial pressure fluctuation value [∆MAP]; heart rate fluctuation value [∆HR]) during anesthesia induction. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of adverse drug reactions (injection pain and myoclonus) and adverse cardiovascular events, vital signs at different time points and the cumulative doses of vasoactive drugs. Results: The hemodynamic fluctuations (∆MAP) in group LR and group E were significantly lower than that in group HR. In addition, the incidence of hypotension and the cumulative norepinephrine doses in group E and group LR were also significantly lower than that in group HR. Furthermore, the incidence of injection pain and myoclonus in group LR and group HR were less frequently recorded compared with group E. There were no significant differences in terms of ∆HR, tachycardia, hypertension, severe bradycardia, vital signs at different time points, lactic acid and blood glucose between both groups. Conclusion: Compared with etomidate, low-dose RT (0.2mg/kg) can not only provide stable hemodynamic parameters but also cause fewer adverse reactions when used for anesthesia induction in patients with cardiac disease.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresEtomidateMyoclonusPropofolAnesthetics, IntravenousBenzodiazepinesHemodynamicsHumansPainProspective StudiesAnesthetics, IntravenousBenzodiazepinesEtomidatePropofolremimazolamcardiac surgeryetomidatehemodynamicsremimazolam tosilate

Identifiers

PMID36789096
PMCPMC9922514
OpenAlexW4319788303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.