ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2023
Profile of Linzagolix in the Management of Endometriosis, Including Design, Development and Potential Place in Therapy: A Narrative Review.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linzagolix therapy versus a placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study (EDELWEISS 3).Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Trial
- NICE Appraisals of Relugolix-CT and Linzagolix for Endometriosis Symptom Management: Commentary on Clinical and Economic Uncertainties.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Linzagolix, with and without add-back therapy, in women with endometriosis-associated pain: results from EDELWEISS 6, a double-blind randomized extension and withdrawal study.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Neuroendocrine-Immune Axis in Endometriosis: A Review on How the Nervous System Goes Beyond Pain Perception.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Linzagolix - new perspectives in the pharmacotherapeutic management of uterine fibroids and endometriosis.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2025Review
- Horizons in Endometriosis: Proceedings of the Montreux Reproductive Summit, 14-15 July 2023.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estrogens play a critical role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and it is logical to assume that lowering estradiol levels with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists may prove effective, especially in women who fail to respond to progestogens. Indeed, due to progesterone resistance, oral contraceptives and progestogens work well in two-thirds of women suffering from endometriosis, but are ineffective in 33% of women. Oral GnRH antagonists have therefore been evaluated for management of premenopausal women with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. The first publication on these drugs reported the efficacy of elagolix. The present paper is a narrative review of linzagolix, which is an orally administered GnRH receptor antagonist with low pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variability. It binds to and blocks the GnRH receptor in the pituitary gland, resulting in a dose-dependent drop in luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) production. This reduction in LH and FSH levels in turn leads to a dose-dependent decline in estrogen. Phase 2 and 3 trials are reviewed and discussed here. There is a place for GnRH antagonists in the management of symptomatic endometriosis, and linzagolix with or without add-back therapy (ABT) is one option that can be used at low doses, avoiding the need for ABT, which is contraindicated in some patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.