Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36789021›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2022

Risk factors and a prediction model for sepsis: A multicenter retrospective study in China.

Ming Li, Peijie Huang, Weiwei Xu, Zhigang Zhou, Yun Xie, Cheng Chen, Yihan Jiang, Guangqing Cui, Qi Zhao, Ruilan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ming LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Songjiang, Shanghai 201600, China.
Peijie HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Songjiang, Shanghai 201600, China.
Weiwei XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Dongtai Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Dongtai, Jiangsu 224200, China.
Zhigang ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Songjiang, Shanghai 201600, China.
Yun XieDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Songjiang, Shanghai 201600, China.
Cheng ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Songjiang, Shanghai 201600, China.
Yihan JiangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Songjiang, Shanghai 201600, China.
Guangqing CuiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Dongtai Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Dongtai, Jiangsu 224200, China.
Qi ZhaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Songjiang, Shanghai 201600, China.
Ruilan WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Songjiang, Shanghai 201600, China.
Songjiang District Central Hospital · CNShanghai First People's Hospital · CNAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNNantong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is typically associated with poor outcomes. There are various risk factors and predictive models for sepsis based on clinical indicators. However, these models are usually predictive of all critical patients. This study explored the risk factors for 28-day outcomes of patients with sepsis and developed a prognosis prediction model. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of sepsis patients hospitalized in three intensive care units (ICUs) from September 1st 2015, to June 30th 2020. Demographic, clinical history, and laboratory test data were extracted from patient records. Investigators explored the risk factors affecting 28-day sepsis prognosis by univariate analysis. The effects of confounding factors were excluded by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and new joint predictive factors were calculated. A model predicting 28-day sepsis prognosis was constructed through data processing analysis. Results: A total of 545 patients with sepsis were included. The 28-day mortality rate was 32.3%. Risk factors including age, D-dimer, albumin, creatinine, and prothrombin time (PT) were predictive of death from sepsis. The goodness-of-fit value for this prediction model was 0.534, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.7207. Further analysis of the immune subgroups ( Conclusions: Risk factors for 28-day sepsis mortality include age, D-dimer, creatinine, PT, and albumin. A decrease in albumin level may exacerbate immunosuppression in patients with sepsis. This study establishes a prediction model based on these indicators, which shows a good degree of calibration and differentiation. This model may provide good predictive value for clinical sepsis prognosis.

Indexed as

HypoalbuminemiaImmunosuppressionModelRisk factorsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID36789021
PMCPMC9924017
OpenAlexW4224232156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.