Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36789017›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2022

Aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation in intensive care units: A questionnaire-based survey of 2203 ICU medical staff in China.

Qin Sun, Wei Chang, Xu Liu, Jianfeng Xie, Haibo Qiu, Yi Yang, Ling Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aerosolised antibiotics in critical care.Intensive care medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qin SunDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.
Wei ChangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.
Xu LiuSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.
Jianfeng XieDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.
Haibo QiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.
Yi YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.
Ling LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University · CNSoutheast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To describe the current status of aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation (MV) and the practice, knowledge, and beliefs about aerosol therapy in physicians working in the intensive care unit (ICU) in China. Methods: A physician self-administered questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was carried out from January 2019 to July 2019. An electronic questionnaire was designed, and physicians who worked regularly in ICUs across several hospitals were contacted through WeChat. Answers to all questions and the general characteristics of physicians who answered the questionnaire were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 2203 medical staff who regularly worked in the ICUs completed this questionnaire (9.0% missing data); 87.7% of the participants were doctors. Most respondents claimed that they often administered aerosolization therapy. Ultrasonic atomizer (50.7%) and jet nebulizer (48.6%) were the most commonly used atomization devices. Bronchodilators (65.8%) and steroids (66.3%) were the most frequently aerosolized drugs during MV. During nebulization, ventilator settings were never changed by 32.7% of respondents. Only 49.1% of respondents knew the appropriate place for a nebulizer. Further, 62.7% of respondents using heated humidifiers reported turning them off during nebulization. Specific knowledge about droplet size and nebulization yield was poor. Respondents from tertiary hospitals and those with higher technical title or work experience tended to have better accuracy than those from primary hospitals or with lower technical titles ( Conclusions: Aerosol therapy was commonly used during MV, and the most frequent drugs were bronchodilators and steroids. Scientific knowledge about the optimal implementation of aerosol therapy during MV seemed deficient.

Indexed as

Aerosolized drugsInhalation administrationMedical trainingNebulizers and vaporizers

Identifiers

PMID36789017
PMCPMC9923942
OpenAlexW4281285843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.