ReviewJournal of intensive medicine2022
Sepsis-related cardiomyopathy: Not an easy task for ICU physicians.
Review in Journal of intensive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Challenges in Takotsubo Syndrome: Bridging Mimics, Mechanisms, and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Early administration of shenfu injection for the incidence of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy in septic patients: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Prognostic value of TAPSE in patients with septic cardiomyopathy: a retrospective observational cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Levosimendan for sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction: friend or foe?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- A protocol to ascertain whether sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy constitutes a phenotype of Takotsubo syndrome.Journal of intensive medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction is common. In addition to acute coronary syndrome, at least two types of left ventricular dysfunction can occur in septic patients: typical septic cardiomyopathy (SC) and sepsis-related takotsubo cardiomyopathy (ST). Although the definition of septic cardiomyopathy is based on left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, both ventricles can be affected. In this context, it has been increasingly recognized that right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction is associated with long-term prognosis in septic patients. Unlike typical SC, ST patients usually displayed LV apical and circumferential mid-ventricular hypokinesia and basal hypercontractility. Timely and precise evaluation of heart dysfunction in sepsis patients is not easy but obviously mandatory. Further studies are still warranted regarding the mechanism, evaluation, and management of septic cardiomyopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.