Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788936›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2022

Criteria deemed important by ICU patients when designating a reference person.

Jean-Pierre Quenot, Nicolas Meunier-Beillard, Eléa Ksiazek, Caroline Abdulmalak, Fiona Ecarnot, Jean-Baptiste Roudaut, Pascal Andreu, François Aptel, Marie Labruyère, Marine Jacquier and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Pierre QuenotDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon 21000, France.
Nicolas Meunier-BeillardINSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Burgundy, Dijon 21000, France.
Eléa KsiazekINSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Burgundy, Dijon 21000, France.
Caroline AbdulmalakDepartment of Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier William Morey, Châlon sur Saône 71000, France.
Fiona EcarnotDepartment of Cardiology, EA3920, University of Franche-Comté, University Hospital Besancon, Besancon 25000, France.
Jean-Baptiste RoudautDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon 21000, France.
Pascal AndreuDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon 21000, France.
François AptelDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon 21000, France.
Marie LabruyèreDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon 21000, France.
Marine JacquierDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon 21000, France.
Jean-Philippe RigaudDepartment of Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier de Dieppe, Dieppe 76202, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Médical de La Teppe · FRUniversité de franche-comté · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We investigated the criteria that hospitalized patients in intensive care units (ICUs) deem important when designating relatives who are best qualified to interact with the caregiving staff. Methods: We conducted an exploratory, observational, prospective, multicenter study between March 1, 2018, and October 31, 2018, within two ICUs. A 12-item questionnaire was distributed to patients in the ICUs by the investigating physicians. Patients were considered eligible if they had a good understanding of the French language and if they had not officially designated surrogates before ICU admission. Results: Seventy-one patients whose average age was 63.9± 17.3 years, of whom 21 (29.5%) were females, completed the questionnaire. The average Charlson comorbidity score was 2.5 ± 2.4, and the average Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) was 39.8 ± 16.5. The main etiology was respiratory infection (40.8%), followed by sepsis (23.9%). The most important criteria identified by patients when selecting reference persons were a good knowledge of the patient's wishes and values, an emotional attachment to the patient, and being a family member. Conclusion: Our findings reveal that ICU patients considered the following criteria to be critical when designating reference persons: knowledge of their wishes and the existence of emotional and family attachments.

Indexed as

Intensive care unitQuestionnaireReference person

Identifiers

PMID36788936
PMCPMC9923949
OpenAlexW4300563101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.