ArticleESC heart failure2023
Machine learning approach to stratify complex heterogeneity of chronic heart failure: A report from the CHART-2 study.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: Epidemiology, Screening, Prevention, and Therapeutic Interventions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Big Data and Trustworthy AI for Heart Failure: A Review.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Review
- 2024 update in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Interoception, cardiac health, and heart failure: The potential for artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnosis and treatment.Physiological reports · 2025Review
- AI-based prediction of heart failure progression in persistent atrial fibrillation using wearable electrocardiography: a brief research report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical phenotypes of heart failure patients with supranormal ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based reproducible prediction of type 2 diabetes subtypes.Diabetologia · 2024Article
- Noncontact remote sensing of abnormal blood pressure using a deep neural network: a novel approach for hypertension screening.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Machine learning approach to stratify complex heterogeneity of chronic heart failure: A report from the CHART-2 study.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Advances in the design, generation, and application of tissue-engineered myocardial equivalents.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsCurrent approaches to classify chronic heart failure (HF) subpopulations may be limited due to the diversity of pathophysiology and co-morbidities in chronic HF. We aimed to elucidate the clusters of chronic patients with HF by data-driven approaches with machine learning in a hospital-based registry. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 4649 patients with a broad spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the CHART-2 (Chronic Heart Failure Analysis and Registry in the Tohoku District-2) study were enrolled to this study. Chronic HF patients were classified using random forest clustering with 56 multiscale clinical parameters. We assessed the influence of the clusters on cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and free from hospitalization by HF. Latent class analysis using random forest clustering identified 10 clusters with four primary components: cardiac function (LVEF, left atrial and ventricular diameters, diastolic blood pressure, and brain natriuretic peptide), renal function (glomerular filtration rate and blood urea nitrogen), anaemia (red blood cell, haematocrit, haemoglobin, and platelet count), and nutrition (albumin and body mass index). All 11 significant clinical parameters in the four primary components and two disease aetiologies (ischaemic heart disease and valvular heart disease) showed statistically significant differences among the 10 clusters (P < 0.01). Cluster 1 (26.7% of patients), which is characterized by preserved LVEF (<59%, 37% of the total) with lowest brain natriuretic peptide (>111.3 pg/mL, 0.9%) and lowest left atrial diameter (>42 mm, 37.4%), showed the best 5 year survival rate of 98.1% for cardiovascular death, 95.9% for non-cardiovascular death, 92.9% for all-cause death, and 91.7% for free from hospitalization by HF. Cluster 10 (6.0% of the total), which is co-morbid disorders of all four primary components, showed the worst survival rate of 39.1% for cardiovascular death, 68.9% for non-cardiovascular death, 23.9% for all-cause death, and 28.1% for free from hospitalization by HF.
conclusionsThese results suggest the potential applicability of the machine leaning approach, providing useful clinical prognostic information to stratify complex heterogeneity in patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.