ArticleCurrent medical imaging2023
Longitudinal Association between L1 Trabecular Attenuation from Chest Computed Tomography (CT) and Bone Mineral Density from Dualenergy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA).
Article in Current medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opportunistic Screening on Chest CT, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2026Review
- Opportunistic use of chest low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) imaging for low bone mineral density and osteoporosis screening: cutoff thresholds for the attenuation values of the lower thoracic and upper lumbar vertebrae.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany studies have shown that vertebral trabecular attenuation measured on CT scan corresponds well to DXA results for bone mineral density. These studies were based on crosssectional data. Hence, there were limitations in explaining the constantly changing vertebral trabecular attenuation from CT and T-score from DXA over time.
objectiveThis study aimed to determine the longitudinal association between the vertebral trabecular attenuation measured on computed tomography (CT) and the T-score measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
methodsWe performed a database search for 333 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer, preoperative treatment, and at least one follow-up chest CT and DXA from January, 2013 through May, 2021. One musculoskeletal radiologist measured the mean vertebral trabecular attenuation of lumbar vertebra 1(L1) on axial unenhanced images at the pedicle level by manually placing the region of interest (ROI). DXA of the lumbar spine was performed, and the lowest T-score of the lumbar spine was used for the analysis. We evaluated the association between L1 trabecular attenuation from chest CT and T-score from DXA over time using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) model to analyze longitudinal corrected data.
resultsA total of 150 women (mean age, 52.4 ± 11.0 years) were included. There was a statistically significant association between L1 trabecular attenuation from chest CT and T-score from DXA in the unadjusted model (p < 0.001) and adjusted model (p < 0.001). T-score value increased by 0.172 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.145-0.200, p < 0.001) per 10 unit (HU) of L1 trabecular attenuation at time = 0 in unadjusted model and by 0.173 (95% CI: 0.143-0.203, p < 0.001) in all adjusted model.
conclusionWe demonstrated that L1 attenuation from chest CT images was longitudinally associated with T-score from DXA, and the degree of association appeared to be decreased over time in breast cancer patients regardless of their medical condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.