ArticleAnimal microbiome2023
Timing and delivery route effects of cecal microbiome transplants on Salmonella Typhimurium infections in chickens: potential for in-hatchery delivery of microbial interventions.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut microbiota in poultry: Roles in nutrition, metabolism and production performance.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of probiotic action in poultry gut: Colonization resistance, bioactive metabolites, quorum sensing activity, and immunomodulation.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Lactobacilli Isolated from the Caecum of Healthy Broilers with Antimicrobial Activity are Probiotic Candidates for Controlling Salmonella.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Threats and Opportunities When Using Chickens as a Model for Host-Microbiota Studies.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Caecal microbiome transplant inhibits transmission and intestinal colonisation ofPoultry science and management · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the effect of essential oils of Cinnamomum zeylanicum and Eucalyptus globulus against Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Gallinarum in broilers.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025Article
- Recent advances in the application of microbiota transplantation in chickens.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Approaches to Enhance the Potency of Vaccines in Chickens.Vaccines · 2024Review
- Freeze-dried fecal microorganisms as an effective biomaterial for the treatment of calves suffering from diarrhea.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Infectious bronchitis virus vaccination, but not the presence of XCR1, is correlated with large differences in chicken caecal microbiota.Microbial genomics · 2024Article
- Avian PathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Prebiotic galactooligosaccharide feed modifies the chicken gut microbiota to efficiently clearmSystems · 2024Article
- Improving broiler health through cecal microbiota transplantation: a comprehensive study on growth, immunity, and microbial diversity.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Peeling back the many layers of competitive exclusion.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ReducesAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExposure to microbes early in life has long-lasting effects on microbial community structure and function of the microbiome. However, in commercial poultry settings chicks are reared as a single-age cohort with no exposure to adult birds which can have profound effects on microbiota development and subsequent pathogen challenge. Microbiota manipulation is a proven and promising strategy to help reduce pathogen load and transmission within broiler flocks. However, administration of microbiota transplant products in a hatchery setting may prove challenging. Effective administration strategies are dependent on key factors, such as; the age of chicks receiving interventions and mode of delivery. This study aimed to assess these two aspects to provide supporting evidence towards microbiome manipulation strategies for use in commercial hatcheries.
resultsManipulation of the microbiota between 4 and 72 h of hatch markedly reduced faecal shedding and colonisation with the foodborne pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (ST4/74). Administration of transplant material via spray or gel drop delivery systems had minimal effect on the protection conferred with fewer birds in transplant groups shown to shed ST4/74 in the faeces compared to PBS-gavaged control birds. Analysis of the microbiome following transplantation demonstrated that all transplant groups had higher diversity and species richness than non-transplant groups during the first week of life and the early stages of infection with ST47/4.The relative abundance of the bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii was significantly higher in CMT groups compared to PBS controls. The presence of F. prausnitzii was also shown to increase in PBS-challenged birds compared to unchallenged birds potentially indicating a role of this bacterium in limiting Salmonella infections.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that administration of microbiome transplants, using methods that would align with hatchery practices, effectively reduced colonisation and shedding of Salmonella in chickens. Age of chicks at microbiome administration had limited effect on the diversity and composition of the microbiome and conferred protection against Salmonella infections. Traditional hatchery delivery systems, such as spray or gel-drop, are sufficient to transfer donor material, alter the microbiome and confer protection against Salmonella. This study helps highlight the opportunity for use of microbiome modification methods within the hatchery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.