ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2023
UnCorrupt SMILES: a novel approach to de novo design.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical language models for early-stage drug discovery: applications, pitfalls, and future directions.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Generation of antifungals to combat drug resistance using language models and diffusion models.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Discovery of Novel HER2 Inhibitors Through Integrated Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ANNalog: generation of MedChem-similar molecules.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Optimization of potential targets for antidepressant Chinese medicines: AI and multi-omics methods.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Generative artificial intelligence based models optimization towards molecule design enhancement.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Review
- The future of pharmaceuticals: Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- A systematic review of deep learning chemical language models in recent era.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Review
- DrugSynthMC: An Atom-Based Generation of Drug-like Molecules with Monte Carlo Search.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Empowering Drug Discovery: Applications, Opportunities and Challenges.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- 3DDPDs: describing protein dynamics for proteochemometric bioactivity prediction. A case for (mutant) G protein-coupled receptors.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- CysDB: a human cysteine database based on experimental quantitative chemoproteomics.Cell chemical biology · 2023Article
- Multi-and many-objective optimization: present and future inFrontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative deep learning models have emerged as a powerful approach for de novo drug design as they aid researchers in finding new molecules with desired properties. Despite continuous improvements in the field, a subset of the outputs that sequence-based de novo generators produce cannot be progressed due to errors. Here, we propose to fix these invalid outputs post hoc. In similar tasks, transformer models from the field of natural language processing have been shown to be very effective. Therefore, here this type of model was trained to translate invalid Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) into valid representations. The performance of this SMILES corrector was evaluated on four representative methods of de novo generation: a recurrent neural network (RNN), a target-directed RNN, a generative adversarial network (GAN), and a variational autoencoder (VAE). This study has found that the percentage of invalid outputs from these specific generative models ranges between 4 and 89%, with different models having different error-type distributions. Post hoc correction of SMILES was shown to increase model validity. The SMILES corrector trained with one error per input alters 60-90% of invalid generator outputs and fixes 35-80% of them. However, a higher error detection and performance was obtained for transformer models trained with multiple errors per input. In this case, the best model was able to correct 60-95% of invalid generator outputs. Further analysis showed that these fixed molecules are comparable to the correct molecules from the de novo generators based on novelty and similarity. Additionally, the SMILES corrector can be used to expand the amount of interesting new molecules within the targeted chemical space. Introducing different errors into existing molecules yields novel analogs with a uniqueness of 39% and a novelty of approximately 20%. The results of this research demonstrate that SMILES correction is a viable post hoc extension and can enhance the search for better drug candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.