Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788579›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2023

UnCorrupt SMILES: a novel approach to de novo design.

Linde Schoenmaker, Olivier J M Béquignon, Willem Jespers, Gerard J P van Westen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ANNalog: generation of MedChem-similar molecules.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linde Schoenmaker *Computational Drug Discovery, Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Olivier J M Béquignon *Computational Drug Discovery, Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Willem JespersComputational Drug Discovery, Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gerard J P van WestenComputational Drug Discovery, Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden, The Netherlands. gerard@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative deep learning models have emerged as a powerful approach for de novo drug design as they aid researchers in finding new molecules with desired properties. Despite continuous improvements in the field, a subset of the outputs that sequence-based de novo generators produce cannot be progressed due to errors. Here, we propose to fix these invalid outputs post hoc. In similar tasks, transformer models from the field of natural language processing have been shown to be very effective. Therefore, here this type of model was trained to translate invalid Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) into valid representations. The performance of this SMILES corrector was evaluated on four representative methods of de novo generation: a recurrent neural network (RNN), a target-directed RNN, a generative adversarial network (GAN), and a variational autoencoder (VAE). This study has found that the percentage of invalid outputs from these specific generative models ranges between 4 and 89%, with different models having different error-type distributions. Post hoc correction of SMILES was shown to increase model validity. The SMILES corrector trained with one error per input alters 60-90% of invalid generator outputs and fixes 35-80% of them. However, a higher error detection and performance was obtained for transformer models trained with multiple errors per input. In this case, the best model was able to correct 60-95% of invalid generator outputs. Further analysis showed that these fixed molecules are comparable to the correct molecules from the de novo generators based on novelty and similarity. Additionally, the SMILES corrector can be used to expand the amount of interesting new molecules within the targeted chemical space. Introducing different errors into existing molecules yields novel analogs with a uniqueness of 39% and a novelty of approximately 20%. The results of this research demonstrate that SMILES correction is a viable post hoc extension and can enhance the search for better drug candidates.

Indexed as

Analog generationDe novo drug designInvalid SMILESMolecular transformerSMILES correction

Identifiers

PMID36788579
PMCPMC9926805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.