Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788571›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Intimate partner violence during pregnancy in COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study from South-west of Iran.

Najmeh Maharlouei, Shohreh Roozmeh, Mohammad-Hassan Zahed Roozegar, Hadi Raeisi Shahraki, Khadijeh Bazrafshan, Shaghayegh Moradi-Alamdarloo, Hossein Molavi Vardanjani, Kamran B Lankarani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Najmeh MaharloueiHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shohreh RoozmehMaternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad-Hassan Zahed RoozegarHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. zahedmohammad05@gmail.com.
Hadi Raeisi ShahrakiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Rahmatieh Educational Complex, Shahrekord, Iran.
Khadijeh BazrafshanMaternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shaghayegh Moradi-AlamdarlooMaternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hossein Molavi VardanjaniDepartment of MPH, Shiraz Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Kamran B LankaraniHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) against pregnant women can cause several complications for the mother and her baby, which are life-threatening. Thus, we aimed to find the prevalence of IPV and its associated factors in pregnant women in Shiraz, Iran.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant mothers in Shiraz between July 2020 and January 2021. The questionnaire consisted of four parts: demographic data, socio-economic status (SES), obstetric and medical history, and questions about IPV. Univariate analysis was performed using Chi-square, McNemar, or Fisher's exact test, and variables with p-value < 0.20 were included in Logistic regression. The odds ratio and CI 95% for variables with p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

resultsThe overall prevalence of IPV was 93.1% among 830 pregnant women in Shiraz. Psychological violence was the most prevalent type (92.9%), followed by sexual (11%) and physical (7.7%) violence. High SES (OR = 3.21, (CI:1.61-6.41)) was the only risk factor for overall violence, and the age group, 30-34, was a risk factor for physical violence. Mother-desired pregnancy (OR = 26 (Cl:0.09-0.79)) and father-desired pregnancy (OR = 0.91, (CI:0.22-3.80)) were protective factors against physical and sexual violence, respectively. Furthermore, Psychological violence and sexual violence increased during COVID-19 Pandemic (P.value < 0.05).

conclusionAccording to the obtained results, the prevalence of IPV during pregnancy in Shiraz was very concerning, especially psychological violence. Improving conflict-solving skills among family members and addressing economic problems could be considered by health policymakers when designing interventional programs and policies to reduce IPV during pregnancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19Intimate Partner ViolenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranPandemicsPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsAbuseIntimate partner violencePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36788571
PMCPMC9926421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.