Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788532›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2023

The first wave of COVID-19 and mental distress of physician residents in Brazil: a comparison between two cohorts.

Mário Luciano de Mélo Silva Júnior, Arthur Violante Sapia, Jonas Marques Cavalcanti Neto, Nathallya Maria Gomes Barbosa, Victória Beatriz Costa Neiva, Euler Nicolau Sauaia Filho

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mário Luciano de Mélo Silva JúniorDivision of Neuropsychiatry, Medical Science Center, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Moraes Rego Av, Cidade Universitária, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil. mariomelosjr@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9002-107X
Arthur Violante SapiaInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jonas Marques Cavalcanti NetoMedical School, Uninassau, Recife, Brazil.
Nathallya Maria Gomes BarbosaMedical School, Uninassau, Recife, Brazil.
Victória Beatriz Costa NeivaMedical School, Uninassau, Recife, Brazil.
Euler Nicolau Sauaia FilhoMedical School, Universidade Dom Bosco, São Luis, Brazil.
Centro Universitário Maurício de Nassau · BRInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Católica Dom Bosco · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe reorganization of healthcare systems to face the COVID-19 pandemic has led to concerns regarding psychological distress of healthcare workers, and training requirements of physician residents.

objectiveTo assess the influence of COVID-19 pandemic on depression, anxiety, burnout and training schedules of residents.

methodsTwo independent cross-sectional studies (the first in November 2019 [control], the second in June 2020, during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic) enrolling physician residents from Brazil, using online surveys. In each of them, we collected demographic and training program data, and assessed depression, anxiety and burnout through PHQ-2, GAD-2 and MBI (2-item version) scales, respectively. We controlled confounding variables with logistic regression analysis.

resultsThe COVID-19 cohort (n = 524) presented a briefer workload and had at least 1 day off per week more frequently, in relation to the control cohort (n = 1 419). The majority of residents (464/524, 89.5%) had a reduction in their duty hours, and believed they would need an extra training period after the end of the pandemic (399/524, 76.2%). The frequency of depression increased (46.0% vs. 58.8%, aOR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.32-2.05), anxiety did not change (56.5% vs. 56.5%, aOR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.99-1.55) and burnout decreased (37.0% vs. 26.1%, aOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60-0.99). Sensitivity analysis did not change these results.

conclusionMental distress is frequent among residents and associated with both training program and social environments. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on training requirements should be specifically addressed by supervisors and policymakers, in a case-by-case basis. Psychological support must be provided to healthcare workers.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19PhysiciansPsychological DistressBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionHealth PersonnelHumansInternship and ResidencyPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AnxietyBurnoutDepressionResidency trainingWorkload

Identifiers

PMID36788532
PMCPMC9926430
OpenAlexW4320726922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.