Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788314›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Influence of surgical position and registration methods on clinical accuracy of navigation systems in brain tumor surgery.

Motomasa Furuse, Naokado Ikeda, Shinji Kawabata, Yangtae Park, Koji Takeuchi, Masao Fukumura, Yuichiro Tsuji, Seigo Kimura, Takuya Kanemitsu, Ryokichi Yagi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Markerless augmented reality registration for surgical guidance: a multi-anatomy clinical accuracy study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Motomasa Furuse *Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan. motomasa.furuse@ompu.ac.jp.
Naokado Ikeda *Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Shinji KawabataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Yangtae ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Koji TakeuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Masao FukumuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichiro TsujiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Seigo KimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Takuya KanemitsuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Ryokichi YagiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Naosuke NonoguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Toshihiko KuroiwaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiko WanibuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of skin distortion due to surgical positioning on the clinical accuracy of the navigation system. The distance errors were measured in four fiducial markers (anterior, posterior, right, and left of the head) after the registration of the navigation system. The distance errors were compared between the surface-merge registration (SMR) method using preoperative imaging and the automatic intraoperative registration (AIR) method using intraoperative imaging. The comparison of the distance errors were performed in various surgical positions. The AIR method had the significant accuracy in the lateral markers than the SMR method (lateral position, 3.8 mm vs. 8.95 mm; p < 0.0001; prone position, 4.5 mm vs. 13.9 mm; p = 0.0001; 5.2 mm vs. 11.5 mm; p = 0.0070). The smallest distance errors were obtained close to the surgical field in the AIR method (3.25-3.85 mm) and in the forehead in the SMR method (3.3-8.1 mm). The AIR method was accurate and recommended for all the surgical positions if intraoperative imaging was available. The SMR method was only recommended for the supine position, because skin distortion was frequently observed in the lateral region.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansProne Position

Identifiers

PMID36788314
PMCPMC9929322
OpenAlexW4320857360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.