Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788295›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Engineering of an electrically charged hydrogel implanted into a traumatic brain injury model for stepwise neuronal tissue reconstruction.

Satoshi Tanikawa, Yuki Ebisu, Tomáš Sedlačík, Shingo Semba, Takayuki Nonoyama, Takayuki Kurokawa, Akira Hirota, Taiga Takahashi, Kazushi Yamaguchi, Masamichi Imajo and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Nonmonotonic rate-dependent adhesion of hydrogels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Hydrogel-based neural engineering for skin wound healing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi TanikawaDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15, W7, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Yuki EbisuDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15, W7, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Tomáš SedlačíkFaculty of Advanced Life Science, Hokkaido University, N21, W11, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Shingo SembaDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15, W7, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Takayuki NonoyamaFaculty of Advanced Life Science, Hokkaido University, N21, W11, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Takayuki KurokawaFaculty of Advanced Life Science, Hokkaido University, N21, W11, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Akira HirotaInstitute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, N21, W10, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Taiga TakahashiResearch Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, N21, W11, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Kazushi YamaguchiResearch Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, N21, W11, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Masamichi ImajoInstitute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, N21, W10, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Hinako KatoGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, N21, W11, Sapporo, Japan, 001-0021.
Takuya NishimuraGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, N21, W11, Sapporo, Japan, 001-0021.
Zen-Ichi TaneiDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15, W7, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Masumi TsudaDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15, W7, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Tomomi NemotoResearch Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, N21, W11, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Jian Ping GongInstitute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, N21, W10, Sapporo, 001-0021, Japan.
Shinya TanakaDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15, W7, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan. tanaka@med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Hokkaido University · JPNational Institutes of Natural Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural regeneration is extremely difficult to achieve. In traumatic brain injuries, the loss of brain parenchyma volume hinders neural regeneration. In this study, neuronal tissue engineering was performed by using electrically charged hydrogels composed of cationic and anionic monomers in a 1:1 ratio (C1A1 hydrogel), which served as an effective scaffold for the attachment of neural stem cells (NSCs). In the 3D environment of porous C1A1 hydrogels engineered by the cryogelation technique, NSCs differentiated into neuroglial cells. The C1A1 porous hydrogel was implanted into brain defects in a mouse traumatic damage model. The VEGF-immersed C1A1 porous hydrogel promoted host-derived vascular network formation together with the infiltration of macrophages/microglia and astrocytes into the gel. Furthermore, the stepwise transplantation of GFP-labeled NSCs supported differentiation towards glial and neuronal cells. Therefore, this two-step method for neural regeneration may become a new approach for therapeutic brain tissue reconstruction after brain damage in the future.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticNeural Stem CellsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell DifferentiationHydrogelsMiceNeuronsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID36788295
PMCPMC9929269
OpenAlexW4320727138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.