Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788182›Full record

SynthesisJournal of patient-reported outcomes2023

Patient-reported outcome measures used to improve youth mental health services: a systematic review.

Kalpana Thapa Bajgain, Mungunzul Amarbayan, Krystle Wittevrongel, Erin McCabe, Syeda Farwa Naqvi, Karen Tang, Fariba Aghajafari, Jennifer D Zwicker, Maria Santana

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Pediatric Orthopaedics.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Commentary: What young people want from psychotherapy.Psychology and psychotherapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kalpana Thapa BajgainDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mungunzul AmarbayanSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Krystle WittevrongelSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Erin McCabeSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Syeda Farwa NaqviDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Karen TangDepartment of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Fariba AghajafariDepartment of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jennifer D ZwickerSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Maria SantanaDepartment of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. mjsantana@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized and validated self-administered questionnaires that assess whether healthcare interventions and practices improve patients' health and quality of life. PROMs are commonly implemented in children and youth mental health services, as they increasingly emphasize patient-centered care. The objective of this study was to identify and describe the PROMs that are currently in use with children and youth living with mental health conditions (MHCs).

methodsThree databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) were systematically searched that used PROMs with children and youth < 18 years of age living with at least one diagnosed MHC. All methods were noted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis. Four independent reviewers extracted data, which included study characteristics (country, year), setting, the type of MHC under investigation, how the PROMs were used, type of respondent, number of items, domain descriptors, and the psychometric properties.

resultsOf the 5004 articles returned by the electronic search, 34 full-texts were included in this review. This review identified both generic and disease-specific PROMs, and of the 28 measures identified, 13 were generic, two were generic preference-based, and 13 were disease-specific.

conclusionThis review shows there is a diverse array of PROMs used in children and youth living with MHCs. Integrating PROMs into the routine clinical care of youth living with MHCs could improve the mental health of youth. Further research on how relevant these PROMs are children and youth with mental health conditions will help establish more uniformity in the use of PROMs for this population.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdolescentChildHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesChild and youthMental health conditionsPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Identifiers

PMID36788182
PMCPMC9928989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.